My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9356
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9356
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:52:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9356
Author
Wigington, R.
Title
Water Right Marketing Strategies to Protect Instream Flows in Colorado.
USFW Year
1990.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Boulder has intensively developed in recent years. The <br />City is now very close to an agreement with the Conservation <br />Board under which the City would contribute a number of senior <br />water rights for instream use which, along with the Berkeley <br />Ditch right, would bring the instream flows through town up to 15 <br />cfs. The agreement is more complicated than the Berkeley Ditch <br />agreement, and will give the City the initial responsibility for <br />calling the contributed water rights for instream use as an agent <br />of the Conservation Board.8 The City's contributed water rights <br />will also complement the Conservation Board's original <br />appropriation for 15 cfs in the urban reaches of Boulder Creek. <br />The Boulder Creek agreement will be a good example of how <br />municipalities can cooperate with the Conservation Board and <br />still have a meaningful and active role in the management of <br />instream water rights inside their boundaries. <br />III. Natural Lake Water Rights for the Mexican Cut Preserve. <br />The natural lake water rights at the Conservancy's Mexican <br />Cut Preserve near the headwaters of the Crystal River is an <br />example of a fairly unique contractual arrangement with the <br />Conservation Board which preceded S.B. 91 and S.B. 212. The <br />Mexican Cut Preserve consists of a number of mining claims <br />8 A very recent draft of this proposed agreement is <br />discussed by Bill McDonald in his March 15, 1990 memorandum to <br />the Colorado Water Conservation Board. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.