Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of the 1,000,000 acre foot average flow at the Juniper-Cross <br />mountain sites would be protected instream if the water rights <br />were purchased and changed, the converted rights would be subject <br />to the same subordinations and would not impose a moratorium on <br />upstream development. The reservation of 100,000 acre feet for <br />future development would support another energy boom and all <br />attendant municipal growth. A 100,000 acre foot reservoir <br />upstream from occupied habitat on the Yampa River could provide <br />flatwater recreation equivalent to Ruedi or Green Mountain <br />Reservoirs. To the extent that the existing subordinations did <br />not provide an acceptable margin for upstream development, a <br />greater portion of these rights could be reserved, with the <br />substantial balance of the water rights still being dedicated to <br />the endangered fish. <br />3. The conversion of Juniper-Cross Mountain water rights <br />to instream use is good water policy because it is consistent <br />with Colorado's compact entitlements. Right now the existing <br />flows of the Yampa River contribute significantly to the filling <br />of Lake Powell and to meeting the Upper Colorado River Basin <br />obligation to the Lower Basin under the Colorado River Compact of <br />1922. Converting the Juniper-Cross Mountain water rights to <br />instream use would only institutionalize this contribution. It <br />also appears that this kind of contribution from the Yampa River <br />was contemplated at the time that the Upper Colorado River <br />Compact of 1948 was drafted, and would have occurred if the <br />20