Laserfiche WebLink
F. Contractual arrangements with water users. <br />1. Exchanges. <br />2. Reservoir releases. <br />3. Bypass by senior water rights. <br />G. Enforcement. <br />1. Stream flow measurement and reporting. <br />2. Private attorney-general, third-party beneficiary, <br />or public trust action in water court. E.g., Sierra Club <br />actions in Case Nos. 85CW456 and 457, Water Division No. 1; <br />85CW151, 582, 583, Water Division No. 5. <br />3. Mandamus action against CWCB. <br />IV. DEFICIENCIES IN COLORADO SYSTEM <br />A. Water quality vs. water rights. Ewa., protection of Q <br />7-10 flows in Case Nos. 84CW177, 84CW202, Water Division No. 2. <br />B. Economic interests not served by CWCB. <br />C. Public interests not served by CWCB. <br />D. Exclusive authority in state agency: is socialism really <br />consistent with the doctrine of prior appropriation? <br />E. The federal presence: reserved rights, endangered <br />species programs, permit conditions, and permit denial. <br />6