Laserfiche WebLink
B. Meadow Act, C.R.S. §37-86-113 (1879): <br />1. Recognizes priority of appropriation for irrigation <br />of meadow land "by the natural overflow or operation of the <br />water" of a natural stream. <br />2. Appropriator has right to construct ditch to replace <br />natural overflow and retain original priority. <br />Rights acquired by natural overflow were described as <br />"vested" in Humphreys Tunnel and Mining Co v Frank, 46 Colo. <br />524, 105 P. 1093 (1909). <br />C. Colorado River Water Conservation District power: <br />To file upon and hold for the use of the public <br />sufficient water of any natural stream to <br />maintain a constant stream flow in the amount <br />necessary to preserve fish.... <br />C.R.S. §37-46-202(1)(j) (1937). Claims made under this <br />statute were disapproved as a matter of statutory <br />interpretation by the Supreme Court in Colorado River Water <br />Conservation District v. Rocky Mountain Power Co., 158 Colo. <br />331, 406 P.2d 798 (1965). <br />D. Codification of diversion requirement in 1969 Act, C.R.S. <br />§37-92-103: <br />1. "Appropriation", "beneficial use", and "priority" <br />were originally defined in relation to "diversion". <br />2. "Diversion" was defined as "removing water from its <br />natural course or location, or controlling water in its <br />natural course or location, by means of a ditch, canal, flume, <br />reservoir, by-pass, pipeline, conduit, well, pump, or other <br />structure or device". <br />3. "Beneficial use" included "the impoundment of water <br />for recreational purposes, including fishery or wildlife". <br />E. Colorado Water Conservation Board powers: <br />1. S.B. 97 (1973). <br />a. Deletion of diversion requirement from §37- <br />92-103; <br />b. CWCB is "vested with the authority, on behalf <br />of the people of the State of Colorado", to "appropriate <br />in a manner consistent with Sections 5 and 6 of Article <br />XVI of the State Constitution", such water as "may be <br />2