My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8276
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8276
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:49:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8276
Author
Williss, C. C.
Title
Documentation of Temperature Model Prepared by the Instream Flow and Aquatic Systems Group, in Cooperation with the U.S. Soil Conservation Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
USFW Year
1984.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1960-1982 Data Base <br />The original data base was used to model the Green River from <br />below Flaming Gorge Dam; the Greendale gage was used to estimate <br />initial flows and temperatures. The White River was modeled from <br />the gage near Watson, Utah, and the Yampa was modeled from the <br />gage near Maybell, Colorado. The Colorado River was modeled from <br />the Gage near Cameo, Colorado. The Gunnison was modeled from the <br />gage near Grand Junction, Colorado. Other tributaries were <br />modeled from gages near the mainstem rivers. A total of 15 USGS <br />gaging stations were used for data input (Table 1). <br />Irrigation demands were approximated at a single node on the <br />Colorado River at river mile 199 (Grand Valley). A constant <br />demand of 1,610 cfs was used from May through October, and 0 cfs <br />was used for the other months. Another irrigation demand node <br />was placed on the Green River (RM 125), but a zero year-round <br />demand was used here (Prewitt, et. al., 1981). Figure 1 shows <br />the basin-wide network, the gaging stations used, and the two <br />irrigation demand nodes. <br />A separate hydrology program called COLHYD was used to distribute <br />the gage flows throughout the network. COLHYD uses the mean <br />monthly discharge from the 15 USGS gaging stations to determine <br />discharge values at additional hydrology nodes located in the <br />temperature model network. Discharge in the model is assumed to <br />vary linearly between USGS gaging stations. As a result, <br />• discharge at intermediate nodes is based on simple mass balance. <br />In addition, the model assumes a constant 70% return flow from <br />irrigation diversions (Guy and Theurer, 1984). <br />Climatological data was developed from the U.S. Department of <br />Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration <br />records, Grand Junction, Colorado. Local Climatological Data <br />(Annual Summary, 1950-1982) were used for average daily <br />information on air temperature, wind speed, percent possible <br />sunshine, and relative humidity. Normals for the period of <br />record were also taken from the Annual Summary. <br />Time Period Extension <br />One goal of this task was to extend the 'baseline' data period <br />to cover the additional time period of water year 1930 to 1959. <br />Most data sources were identical to those used by Theurer, namely <br />published United States Geological Survey and computerized <br />WATSTOR data for the system hydrology and water temperatures and <br />the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Local <br />Climatological Data from Grand Junction, Colorado, for the <br />meteorological data. Internal system hydrology was synthesized <br />using solution techniques developed by Guy and Theurer (Guy and <br />. Theurer, 1984). The stream geometry data assembled by Theurer <br />remained unchanged. <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.