Laserfiche WebLink
<br />offspring that are sterile or inviable after several generations (Lande <br />1988). The 1% maximum inbreeding rate recommended by Simberloff (1988) <br />for wild populations should be used as a target for an effective <br />population size in developing broodstocks of the endangered Colorado <br />River fishes. <br />Allendorf (1993) recommended stocking equal numbers of offspring of <br />family lots from pedigreed matings. This practice will eliminate or <br />minimize the potential for loss of genetic diversity. Philipp et al. <br />(1993) recommended that genetic characterization of captive-reared fish <br />be compared with wild stocks to ensure that the genetic diversity is <br />similar. <br />F. Ideal Number of Founders for Broodstock Development. The designation of <br />"endangered" to any organism under the Endangered Species Act implies <br />that the numbers of wild organisms are limited. The basic goal in an <br />captive propagation program is to maintain the genetic diversity of <br />captive broodstocks that is similar to the parent wild stock. Simberloff <br />(1988) emphasized that general agreement does not exist about the <br />absolute numbers of animals needed to maintain genetic diversity in <br />captive propagation programs. <br />To achieve Simberloff's recommendation of keeping the maximum rate of <br />inbreeding at 1% or lower, an effective population size of fifty parents <br />(25 males and 25 females) is needed for development of a broodstock. <br />Mating of one male with one female is desirable to maximize the genetic <br />contribution from all fish used as parents (Allendorf 1993). This <br />strategy of 25 paired matings is recommended as a target for an effective <br />population size in the captive propagation of endangered Colorado River <br />fishes. This strategy was designated as "Priority 1" in Box 10 for the <br />maximization of genetic diversity in broodstock development. The <br />fertilized eggs from mating one male and one female (i.e., 1 family lot) <br />should be divided and reared in separate facilities to avoid the total <br />loss of the genetic contribution from those two parents through an <br />accident or catastrophe. <br />It is desirable to mate the 25 pairs of endangered fish in one year <br />because broodstocks would mature at the same time so that equal numbers <br />of all family lots could be produced and stocked from parents of the same <br />age. This procedure would eliminate many variables that could influence <br />genetic diversity and stocking success. <br />If sufficient numbers of endangered fish are in the wild, the goal would <br />be to increase wild recruitment until self-sustaining populations are <br />realized to meet the carrying capacity of available habitat. However, <br />for declining endangered fish stocks with little or no recruitment, <br />captive propagation may be necessary to augment wild stocks since a <br />critical level of abundance of adults or threshold density (Allee Effect) <br />may be needed for successful natural spawning (Lande 1988). In river <br />reaches where the endangered fish have been extirpated, restoration <br />stocking may be necessary, provided that suitable habitat is available <br />for all life stages. If an effective population size of 50 adults cannot <br />be obtained in one year, broodstock development can be accomplished over <br />a number of years by mating one male with one female (Item 2 in Box 10). <br />34 <br />L