My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8123
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:48:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8123
Author
Wydoski, R. S.
Title
Coordinated Hatchery Facility Plan
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Need for Captive-Reared Endangered Fish and Propagation Facilities.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />(Ralls and Ballou 1992; Thomas 1990). The natural genetic diversity within <br />a population is associated with its evolutionary history and is important <br />for adaptation, long-term survival, and maximum production in the wild. <br />Protecting genetic diversity within a hatchery broodstock prevents <br />artificial selection, inbreeding, and genetic drift which frequently occurs <br />in hatchery programs (Allendorf 1993). The concept of "maximally protecting <br />genetic diversity" within a hatchery stock assumes that sufficient numbers <br />of the appropriate donor stock or population were used such that the <br />broodstock truly reflects the genetic characteristics of the donor <br />population. Proper broodstock development during the founding phase of a <br />propagation program is fundamental in the recovery of endangered species <br />because the species must possess sufficient genetic diversity to allow <br />survival and recruitment of the fish in altered and partially restored <br />environments. <br />It is especially important to obtain a random sample of fish that represents <br />i the donor population by sampling adults within and among spawning times <br />i throughout the spawning range of that stock. The number of wild fish <br />removed at any one time should be limited so that the remaining wild fish <br />are not adversely affected by their removal unless the species is in <br />immediate danger of extinction. In general, no more fish should be removed <br />than can be spawned at a particular time or maintained in available holding <br />facilities. Following successful contribution to the F, generation, wild <br />fish should be returned to the river reach where they were collected. If <br />further stocking is deemed necessary, additional wild fish can be captured <br />and used to supplement the genetic diversity in broodstocks. <br />F. Genetic Risks Associated with Captive Propagation and Stocking. Planning <br />recovery efforts for the endangered fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin <br />will be accomplished following a logical and systematic approach (Box 3) <br />that will prevent potential genetic risks. A genetic risk is broadly, <br />defined as the sum of critical uncertainties associated with captive <br />propagation that may change the genetic diversity both within and among wild <br />stocks. Risk assessment consists of (1) estimating risk and (2) managing <br />risk (Lichatowich and Watson 1993). Risk assessment will be addressed in <br />specific stocking plans on a case-by-case basis. The potential to manage <br />potential genetic risks to wild stocks will be essential for a "no jeopardy <br />opinion" under Section 7 consultation of the Endangered Species Act. <br />If conducted in a scientifically sound manner, captive propagation of <br />endangered fish will prevent the major types of genetic risk: (1) <br />extinction of the species, (2) loss of genetic diversity within a species, <br />stock, or population; (3) loss of genetic diversity among stocks or <br />populations; and (4) inadvertent artificial selection that may lead to <br />directional succession from inbreeding or genetic swamping of wild stocks <br />(Busak 1990; Kapuscinski et al. 1993). The genetic processes that may be <br />affected by these risks and the hatchery activities that may cause the risks <br />are summarized in Box 4. The extinction of indigenous fish stocks can be <br />caused by stocking captive-reared fish but is generally preceded by the loss <br />of genetic diversity within and between populations. <br />1 <br />1 23
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.