Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />comprehensive "Hatchery Feasibility Study for Endangered Fishes in the <br />Colorado River Basin" for the State of Colorado (URS Consultants 1991; 1992). <br />However, even with these efforts, the Program element of propagation and <br />stocking has been difficult to address because of uncertainty in stock <br />identification, lack of precise knowledge about the status and trends of the <br />endangered fish stocks, and lack of specific recovery objectives in long-term <br />strategic recovery plans. Long-term Program needs to propagate and stock <br />endangered fish to augment wild stocks have not been well defined. This <br />dilemma was due, in part, to the fact that most past Program efforts were <br />directed at defining the life history and identifying ecological requirements <br />of the endangered fish. However, the need for experimental stocking has been <br />recognized by all biologists. Field experimentation on the role of olfaction <br />and chemoreception in endangered fish homing or fidelity and the value of <br />flooded bottomlands to recruitment was only recently begun in which captive- <br />reared endangered fish needs were identified. Finally, the results of ongoing <br />genetic studies are not available to aid in verification of presumptive <br />spawning stocks and few broodstocks of presumptive wild stocks have been <br />developed to meet Program goals of maintaining genetic diversity (Williamson <br />1993a). <br />Although biologists in the Upper Colorado River Basin agree that there is a <br />need for captive-reared endangered fishes for field experimentation (including <br />augmentation and restoration stocking), they question the need for large-scale <br />augmentation and restoration stocking. Upper basin biologists also agree that <br />stocking should be viewed as a management tool and not a panacea for recovery <br />since stocking alone will not result in self-sustaining wild fish populations. <br />Indeed, an extreme management action such as establishment of captive <br />populations indicates that recovery efforts may have been initiated too late <br />(Tear et al. 1993). Adequate habitat and control of non-native fishes that <br />are predators on or competitors with the native fishes are needed for recovery <br />of the endangered fishes, especially to overcome the major limiting factor or <br />"bottleneck" of survival in the early life stages. <br />III. PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN <br />The approach (Figure 1) used to obtain necessary information for this plan <br />focused on identification of presumptive stocks of endangered fish in the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin, review their status and trends, and establishment <br />of priorities by species and stocks within species. The presumptive stocks of <br />endangered fishes in the San Juan River were not included in the analysis of <br />status, trends, and priorities because a separate recovery effort is being <br />developed for that river. The priorities were used to identify captive-reared <br />fish needs that, in turn, were used to identify hatchery facility needs. The <br />plan: <br />1. identifies presumptive stocks of endangered fishes in the upper <br />basin, <br />2. defines the present status and trends of these stocks, <br />3. establishes priorities by species and by stocks within species, <br />4. identifies propagation needs for recovery of endangered fishes in the <br />upper basin, <br />