My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8150
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8150
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:47:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8150
Author
Wydoski, R. S.
Title
Realistic Management of Endangered Species--An Overview.
USFW Year
1977.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the art of biopolitics involves motivating the general public so that it <br />will demand changes for the benefit of wildlife resources. He is supported <br />by Gilbert (1971), who emphasized that the manager must use effective pub- <br />lic relations to help influence politicians and political action in the <br />proper direction to conserve natural resources. The thoughts just presented <br />on critical habitat provide practical or realistic approaches to maintaining <br />such habitat for threatened and endangered species as well as for preserving <br />habitat required by game or commercial species. <br />Propagation. Propagation has been considered a viable option in most <br />recovery plans that have been drafted. Most of the research for development <br />of the methodology for propagation has been on birds and mammals (U.S. Fish <br />and Wildlife Service, 1976). Although some success has been achieved in <br />rearing the Colorado squawfish and humpback sucker (Toney, 1974), much work <br />remains to bd,done on space requirements, nutritional requirements, and <br />behavior if management of these species by propagation is to be successful. <br />Once a propagation program is successful and surplus animals are avail- <br />able, stocking can be made in suitable natural habitats. However, careful <br />evaluation of such releases must be made so that past mistakes in releasing <br />game birds, fish, and mammals are not repeated. Natural areas within state <br />or federal refuges, monuments, or parks that provide suitable habitat for <br />threatened and endangered species should be used when possible, since these <br />habitats can be protected and are already under state or federal management <br />(Duffey, 1974). <br />Perhaps the most important practical consideration for propagation <br />should be the gene pool of the captive stock. As plant and animal popula- <br />tions decline until the species is rare, the genetic diversity of the species <br />may be decreased. This genetic diversity or heterozygosity allows the org- <br />anism to adapt to various environmental conditions, and its decrease may <br />accelerate the extinction of the species. Smith et al. (1976) reviewed the <br />importance of population genetics in the management of all fish and wildlife <br />populations, and their concern is especially applicable to threatened and <br />endangered species. <br />Funding of Endangered Species Programs and the Systems Approach for <br />Establishing Priorities. Adequate funding for research and management of <br />endangered species is not now available. Pister (1976) concluded that it <br />should be a function of legislative bodies to provide the finances for such <br />programs. This will not be accomplished easily, because federal and state <br />conservation agencies are already underfunded and understaffed. <br />As 1 mentioned earlier, public support and pressure will be required <br />to obtain the funds necessary for endangered species programs. Since <br />several states have experimented without much success to obtain funds in <br />various ways, the most practical solution to fund an endangered species <br />program would be to obtain state general funds that could be used as match- <br />ing for federal assistance under the 1973 Act. Such funding should be <br />acceptable to the public and should not cause a conflict with sportsmen by <br />using revenue from their license fees. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.