Laserfiche WebLink
<br />if Congress exempted the Tellico project and established a precedent such <br />that any agency could avoid compliance with the Act by ignoring its provi- <br />sions and delaying enforcement until it could argue that stopping the project <br />would be economically unsound. <br />Wheelwright (1977) provided another example--a plant (lousewort) if <br />listed as an endangered species--that could stop the construction of a dam <br />on the St. John River in Maine because Section 7 would be violated. He also <br />provided a number of examples of rare plants and animals that could potent- <br />ially be listed as endangered and obstruct or stop other commercial develop- <br />ment or government projects. Wheelwright also stated, however, that the <br />majority of nearly 150 conflicts between the provisions of Section 7 and <br />planned federal projects in the 4-year history of the 1973 Act have been <br />resolved through negotiation and compromise. The general solution has been <br />to modify the project so that the habitat of the endangered species would not <br />be adversely affected. <br />A number of water development projects are in progress or planned for <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin that could jeopardize the continued exist- <br />ence of four species of endemic fish. The Colorado squawfish (Pt chocheilus <br />lucius) and the humpback chub (Gila cypha) were officially designate as <br />endangered" by the U.S. Department of the Interior (1973). In 1975, the <br />Desert Fishes Council recommended the bonytail chub (Gila ele ans) for list- <br />ing as "endangered" and the humpback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus as "threat- <br />ened." <br />Laws are mechanisms for getting things done for the purposes of society, <br />and therefore will protect and foster the greatest values for society (Trel- <br />case, 1976). Trelcase believes that any laws can be changed if society so <br />dictates, but sometimes such changes require a long time to be implemented. <br />Public attitudes and values have changed since 1950 and public concern <br />about the progressive deterioration of the environment is expected to con- <br />tinue in the future (Goldman, 1973). Although the 1973 Act is concerned with <br />conservation of threatened and endangered species, it is also concerned with <br />the integrity of the ecosystems where these species live. Therefore, it is <br />realistic to assume that the public will continue to support the Act and to <br />use it, where necessary, to protect the environment. <br />MORAL OBLIGATION OF BIOLOGISTS TO ALL WILDLIFE SPECIES <br />The study of geological history has shown that the earth has undergone <br />numerous vast environmental changes, and that various organisms have become <br />extinct and have been replaced by new species during the process of evolution. <br />As environmental conditions become critical, a species must adapt to the <br />new conditions, migrate to more favorable habitat, or die. Organisms can <br />adapt by changes in morphology, physiology, or behavior so that they can func- <br />tion and exist under certain newly imposed environmental conditions. These <br />adaptations can be influenced by environmental or genetic factors or both. <br />Genetic diversity is believed to be the more likely characteristic that per- <br />mits adaption for survival. If a species becomes highly specialized in its <br />biological requirements, the probability that it will adapt to change is less <br />likely. <br />3