Laserfiche WebLink
X477 Wydoski <br />REALISTIC MANAGEMENT OF ENDANGERED SPECIES--AN OVERVIEW <br />Richard S. Wydoski <br />Leader, Utah Cooperative Fishery Research Unit <br />INTRODUCTION <br />As a biologist with the Cooperative Fishery Research Program who is a <br />federal employee, stationed at a university, and working with colleagues in <br />several state and federal agencies, I have become acutely aware that opin- <br />ions differ greatly among various individuals or agencies regarding the <br />study, preservation, and management of threatened or endangered species. <br />Although much controversy exists, each view may be legitimate for differ- <br />ent and varied reasons. Therefore, the topic of this session on the <br />"Realistic Management of Endangered Species" is appropriate and timely for <br />this conference because the western states contain natural resources that <br />are needed by our country, but the development or use of these resources <br />could adversely affect a variety of threatened or endangered species. <br />q ??5 b <br />Water is one of the most precious resources, particularly in the arid <br />and semi-arid west. The use of water and development of the rivers with <br />dams and irrigation diversions allowed this region to be inhabited as our <br />country expanded. Today, further development of water projects already in <br />progress or planned could cause the extinction of several endangered fish <br />in western waters. Although fish may be used more extensively as examples <br />in this session, since we are meeting as the Western Division of the American <br />Fisheries Society, the concepts apply equally to other organisms. <br />In today's session, the management of endangered species will be dis- <br />cussed from several points of view: the state agencies, federal government, <br />and recovery teams. These views should provide a synthesis of various ideas <br />for future consideration in the management of endangered species. <br />This paper will begin the session by (1) providing a summary of fed- <br />eral legislation, (2) discussing the moral obligation and rationale for the <br />management of nongame species -- including threatened and endangered species <br />-- and (3) offering some views of biologists for consideration in the real- <br />istic management of such species. <br />FEDERAL LEGISLATION <br />McEvoy (1973),who has reviewed the American public's concern of the <br />environment, stated that there have been surges and declines in the public's <br />concern about America's natural environment over the past century. He <br />pointed out that two world wars and a depression interrupted the public's <br />concern for some time and that interest in the environment did not revive <br />until the mid-1950s. McEvoy demonstrated that changes occurred in three <br />indicators of environmental awareness beginning with the media, extending <br />to voluntary associations, and finally reaching the public. Public concern <br />was attributed to two trends: (1) an apparent increase in personal exposure <br />to the natural environment, and (2) the rapid deterioration of many aspects <br />1977, Proc. Annu. Conf. West. Assoc. Game & Fish Comm. 57: 2 ?.3 , 18".