My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9333
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9333
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:47:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9333
Author
Wright, B. R. and J. A. Sorensen.
Title
Feasibility of Developing and Maintaining a Sport Fishery in the Salt River project Canals, Phoenix, Arizona.
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
Phoenix.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- FEASIBILITY OF DEVELOPING AND MAINTAINING A SPORT FISHERY IN THE SALT RIVER PROJECT CANALS <br />relative abundance. Benthic macroinvertebrates <br />are animals that live in the bottom substrate, as <br />well as on the substrate surface and on aquatic <br />vegetation (Thorp and Covich 1991). Bimonthly <br />samples were collected from September 1993 to <br />July 1994, using a 0.04-m3 (300-in3) Petite Ponar <br />Dredge. Dredge samples were collected from both <br />sides and the middle of the canal at both the <br />upper and lower ends of each station, for a total <br />of 6 samples. If, after 3 attempts, no substrate or <br />organisms were obtained in a dredge sample, no <br />additional sampling was conducted at that station. <br />A 500-µm sieve bucket was used to remove <br />sediment fines (i.e., silt) from each sample. Each <br />sample was preserved with 10% formalin or 70% <br />ethanol. <br />We used Rose Bengal® powder to stain each <br />sample. Then, each sample was rinsed with water <br />using a 250-µm sieve and placed in a shallow <br />specimen tray. Individuals from each taxon were <br />identified, counted, and stored in vials with 70% <br />ethanol. Taxonomic classifications were based on <br />Barnes (1968) and Arnett (1985). Aquatic <br />Consulting and Testing, Inc. processed 1/3 of our <br />samples for quality control purposes. <br />Zooplankton. For the purposes of our study, <br />zooplankton were defined as invertebrates found <br />in the water column that float, drift, or weakly <br />swim (Thorp and Covich 1991). Invertebrates <br />found in the water column included true <br />zooplankton, aquatic and terrestrial insects, and <br />non-insect species. Quarterly zooplankton <br />samples were collected from 8 stations on the <br />Arizona Canal (Appendix C) between December <br />1992 and July 1994 to estimate seasonal <br />zooplankton abundance and percent species <br />composition. Using a portable water pump or a <br />bucket, 3 samples were collected from each station <br />from a depth of about 0.5 m. Twenty liters of <br />water were filtered through an 80-µm, Wisconsin- <br />type plankton net using a portable water pump or <br />a bucket. Samples were rinsed with deionized <br />water, stored in clear polyethylene bottles, and <br />preserved in 70% ethanol. Samples were sent to <br />Aquatic Consulting and Testing, Inc. for <br />identification and enumeration using taxonomy <br />based on Barnes (1968). To maintain decimal <br />precision from low total counts, mean densities <br />were recorded as numbers of organisms per 20 L, <br />rather than numbers per liter. <br />Public Opinion Surveys <br />In May 1994, Behavioral Research Center, <br />Inc. conducted 2 separate telephone surveys <br />(Appendix D) to determine Maricopa County <br />residents' attitudes toward the use of the SRP <br />canals as an urban fishery. The first survey <br />interviewed 300 licensed anglers, while the second <br />survey targeted 600 individuals of the general <br />public. Licensed anglers were chosen randomly <br />from a list of current state or urban fishing license <br />holders. The general public respondents from <br />both urban and rural regions of Maricopa County <br />were selected at random from a list of phone <br />numbers by Behavior Research Center, Inc.'s <br />automated system. <br />The surveys examined the following aspects: <br />regional representation, current angling <br />participation, respondent interest in an Urban <br />Canal Fishing Program (UCFP), demographic <br />status, fish species preference, willingness to pay, <br />and level of use. Projected angler-use days, <br />potential new anglers, and revenues were <br />calculated. <br />Study Area Mapping <br />The study area was mapped using an <br />ARC/INFO Geographic Information System <br />(GIS), ground-truthed observations, Phoenix area <br />maps, and Salt River Valley Water Users' <br />Association's maps (1993a, b). A map of physical <br />structures and potential public access sites along <br />the Arizona Canal was created (Appendix A). <br />Habitat features and qualitative flow regimes were <br />also mapped (Appendix B). Velocity <br />measurements were not available for our sampling <br />sites on the Arizona Canal. Instead, we used <br />terms from Orth (1983) to define flow regimes <br />within the Arizona Canal: (1) riffles are high <br />velocity, turbulent water; (2) runs or glides are <br />steady, laminar flows; and (3) pools are low <br />velocity or still water. <br />16 ARIZONA GAME & FISH DEPARTMENT, TECH. REP. 18 B. R. WRIGHT AND J. A. SORENSEN 1995
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.