Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />t <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />t <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />t <br />t <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />12. No single tag or mark is the 'best' under all conditions. Consequently, it is <br />important to evaluate a number of tagging systems. Because different sizes of <br />hatchery-reared and wild fish may have to be marked depending on the <br />prescribed objective(s) to be accomplished, various tagging systems may have <br />to be used. Companion studies for other tagging systems on Colorado River <br />endangered fishes will be conducted starting fall 1989 at Dexter NFH. Other <br />tagging systems that will be evaluated at Dexter in addition to PIT tags include <br />V. I. (visible implant) tags, Carlin tags, acrylic dyes, and Floy-anchor tags. <br />Each tagging system will be evaluated for its suitability and biological <br />compatibility with a particular size of fish along with other performance <br />parameters, e.g., retention, readability, tissue healing, fish survival and growth <br />over time, cost, and difficulty of application. Hatchery-reared Colorado <br />squawfish, razorback sucker, and bonytail from Dexter NFH will be the three <br />species evaluated. The information obtained from such a controlled study will <br />allow researchers to determine the tagging system(s) that would be most <br />appropriate for a specific size fish. Written protocols should be developed and <br />workshops conducted to provide guidelines and instruct researchers in the <br />proper application of the various tagging/marking system(s) used. <br />29 <br />