Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />F1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />fl <br />1 <br />1 <br />t <br />1 <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />needs to be identified before any further 'controlled' studies can be conducted <br />to evaluate the performance of PIT tags for these fishes. Conducting such <br />studies in a controlled setting (preferably circular tanks, raceways or ponds <br />where water levels could be controlled and the ponds drained as needed) <br />would allow the collection of valuable biological and technical information <br />concerning the reliability and longevity of the PIT tag. Moreover, the <br />condition and fate of test fish could be monitored more frequently and <br />effectively with the likelihood that all study objectives would be accomplished <br />and meaningful data obtained. <br />Continue studies on the performance of PIT tags for various sizes of juvenile <br />Colorado squawfish, razorback sucker, and bonytail to expand on the results <br />provided herein. Obtaining such data for these fish is pivotal to any future <br />augmentation program for Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker. These <br />studies should be conducted in a controlled setting, preferably at a hatchery or <br />comparable research facility, e.g., Dexter NFH. (Reference Item No. 12 under <br />'Recommendations'). <br />Continue laboratory studies at Hotchkiss NFH to evaluate the performance of <br />PIT tags for juvenile Colorado squawfish until July 1990. <br />Continue monitoring adult Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker PIT <br />tagged in September 1989 at Dexter NFH. Obtaining information on the <br />performance of PIT tags for adult fish is important before PIT tags can be <br />used on wild, adult fish. Additionally, PIT tagging hatchery fish will 1) provide <br />26 <br />1