My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8095
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8095
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:40:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8095
Author
National Research Council.
Title
Impacts of Emerging Agricultural Trends on Fish and Wildlife Habitat.
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
Washington, D.C.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />and wildlife habitat and identified research needs. These trends and <br />impacts were examined in the broad sense for most species. <br />This report emphasizes game mammals, birds, and fish because of a <br />need to focus and limit the scope of the study. The committee <br />recognizes, of course, that natural habitats contain many other types <br />of mammals, birds, and fish, as well as insects, earthworms, fungi, <br />and bacteria. Mammals, birds, and fish high in the trophic levels of <br />natural ecosystems often feed on plants, insects, and microorganisms <br />low in the system. These lower organisms are vital to the survival of <br />the ecosystem, fulfilling such necessary functions as decomposing <br />organic wastes and recycling the essential elements such as carbon, <br />nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and calcium. LOSS of any of these vital <br />groups of natural biota will damage habitat quality and may cause the <br />loss of game mammals, birds, and fish that directly and indirectly <br />depend upon these other biota. <br />Endangered species are not included in this analysis because the <br />study of such species is a highly complex problem, often involving <br />consideration of many regional and other limitations, and is thus <br />outside the scope of this study. <br />This report is submitted in compliance with the terms of the <br />agreement with the sponsoring agencies. It reflects the collective <br />judgment of approximately 150 agricultural and wildlife scientists <br />from many different disciplines and geographic locations throughout <br />the united states. The Committee also reviewed an extensive <br />literature during its investigation; but because many projections were <br />required, the literature often served only as a base for informed <br />conjecture. <br />The Committee appreciates the assistance of the BARR staff who <br />contributed so generously to this effort. They include Selma P. <br />Baron, Michael E. Berger, Sheridan E. Caldwell, Philip ROss, Asha G. <br />Rugimbana, Mary L. Sutton, Lawrence C. Wallace, and Michael D. <br />zagata. Consultants to the Chairmen were Sandra O. Archibald, Ronald <br />W. Hardy, and Frances P. Solomon; they completed many details in the <br />development of this study, and we appreciate their dedication and <br />professional competence. <br /> <br />Chester O. McCorkle, Jr. <br />Co-chairman, phase I <br />Agricultural Trends <br /> <br />John E. Halver <br />Co-chairman, Phase II <br />Impacts on Fish and <br />Wildlife Habitat <br /> <br />viii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.