Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />The agricultural and forest industry is the largest modifier of the <br />lands and waters that provide habitats for fish and wildlife. The <br />size, scope, and nature of agricultural practices such as cultivating <br />cropland, grazing rangeland, and harvesting forests have profoundly <br />affected the quality of these habitats. <br /> <br />TRENDS IN AGRICULTURE <br /> <br />Agricultural land use and practices are changing. An increased demand <br />for food and forest products is placing pressure on agricultural <br />production and thus on our land and water. These pressures will <br />remain high. The rising costs of production and declining net returns <br />per unit of product place pressures on farmers to increase <br />productivity further. In response, changes in farm size, production <br />'practices, and ownership patterns may occur that will affect wildlife <br />habitats. <br /> <br />NEEDS FOR THE FUTURE <br /> <br />These changes will have both positive and negative impacts on fish and <br />wildlife habitats. Agriculture and wildlife each have specific needs, <br />and the direct relationship between agricultural practices and <br />wildlife habitats must be more widely recognized. The value of fish <br />and wildlife to society must be considered as well as the value of <br />maintaining a productive agriculture. These values are not <br />necessarily in conflict. They can be brought into better balance <br />through careful planning, consistent policy, and appropriate <br />incentives to landowners. <br />Political, social, economic, scientific, and technological trends <br />greatly influence agricultural practices. Changes in some of these <br />practices will increase habitat quality for fish and wildlife, whereas <br />changes in others will decrease habitat quality. The trends and <br />practices along with the impacts on habitats are summarized below. <br /> <br />xv <br />