Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />restoring ripari- <br />an areas serving <br />as the principal <br />migratory corri- <br />dors and breeding <br />habitats for all our <br />songbirds. In 1991, <br />we gave a grant <br />to the Bureau of Land <br />Management for acquisition and <br />restoration of the San Pedro River cor- <br />ridor in Arizona. Breeding populations <br />of yellow warblers have increased 300 <br />percent since then, and now the San <br />Pedro is one of the premier birding hot <br />spots in the Southwest. Multiple grants <br />have been made for restoring native <br />vegetation to the lower Rio Grande <br />riparian corridor of south Texas. In <br />California, significant funding has <br />been provided to The Nature <br />Conservancy for acquiring and restor- <br />ing the Consumnes riparian area- <br />California's last un-dammed Sierran <br />river and another Bureau of Land <br />Management priority area for conser- <br />vation. The Llano Seco Ranch along <br />the upper Sacramento River and the <br />Valensin Ranch, adjacent to the <br />Consumnes River, were also funded as <br />part of a broad-based riparian restora- <br />tion effort that will grow significantly <br />in the coming year. <br />In 1997, the Foundation opened <br />its first regionally focused office in <br />California. Recognizing the colossal <br />job ahead in implementing the Bay- <br />Delta Accord's billion-dollar program <br />for restoring San Francisco Bay and the <br />Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, <br />stakeholders in this process have unit- <br /> <br />ed with state and federal agencies to <br />invite NFWF to help implement the <br />ecosystem restoration grant program. <br />Catalytic involvement in critical <br />California conservation issues-water <br />conservation, endangered species pro- <br />tection, habitat restoration, etc.-is not <br />new to us. Over the past ten years, the <br />Foundation has awarded an average of <br />15 percent of our total national portfo- <br />lio to projects in the Golden State. In <br />the last three years alone, NFWF <br />invested $9 million in federal funds <br />to support over 100 California projects. <br />This money was matched at a ratio of <br />over three to one, resulting in over <br />$33 million to support conservation <br />on the ground. <br />NFWF's local, focused involve- <br />ment in California makes perfect <br />sense. Intense population pressures <br />(almost one out of every ten Americans <br />is a Californian), extensive agriculture, <br />and numerous competing interests <br />for California's life blood, water, have <br />stretched magnificent but fragile natur- <br />al resources to their limits. Efforts to <br />restore and protect California's <br />marine/estuarine, terrestrial, and <br />riparian ecosystems, simultaneous <br />with providing for the many needs of <br />a burgeoning population, represent a <br />test case that will be closely scrutinized <br />by the nation at large. The Foundation <br />is committed to assisting, facilitating, <br />and, when appropriate, leading <br />California's grand conservation <br />experiment. <br />Although George C. Marshall <br />probably did not know a dickey bird <br />from a California condor, he would <br />recognize the fiscal symmetry and <br /> <br />A Marshall Plan for Fish and Wildlife <br /> <br /> <br />implementation <br />structure of Partners <br />in Flight and the strate- <br />gic struts underpinning <br />the Foundation's fledgling Neotropical <br />migratory bird initiative. We also <br />believe that he would recognize the <br />Foundation as a true heir to the spirit <br />of his Marshall Plan. Although the <br />projects that have received the $29 mil- <br />lion we have invested in bird conserva- <br />tion in the last seven years are still in <br />the fledgling stages, we have taken <br />huge strides toward implementing bird <br />conservation on a continental scale. In <br />their own way, each of our other grant <br />initiatives-wetlands, fisheries, conser- <br />vation education, and wildlife and <br />habitat -operates in a fashion that <br />incorporates both the ethos and <br />mechanics of the Marshall Plan. All of <br />our grants are strategically targeted to <br />solve conservation problems and bene- <br />fit local communities. Another way of <br />looking at us is to consider where we <br />might be today if the Foundation had <br />not decided to pay homage to Marshall <br />on behalf of bird conservation. We <br />would be confronting a plethora of <br />high-profile endangered species- <br />songbirds-and our response to these <br />declining songbird populations would <br />be in total disarray. Instead, we have a <br />plan, a Marshall plan for songbirds, <br />Partners in Flight, which is effectively <br />coordinating a broad conservation <br />agenda, and funding through NFWF. <br /> <br /> <br />National Fish and Wildlife Foundation 7 <br />