Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />February 2000 CR WCD * y ~ Rirer Basin Small ResetWi:r Study * Pag? ~ 5 <br /> <br />2.0 WATER RESOURCES AND HYDROLOGY <br /> <br />The Yampa River is central to the economy of the basin, providing most of the available water supply <br />in the region (BBC, 1998). Yampa River basin political leaders and water users are concerned that the <br />Recovery Program could inhibit existing and future water uses in the basin. Local political leaders <br />want to assure that the Recovery Program does not inhibit future water development and, <br />consequently, limit economic growth (T. Wright Dickinson, personal communication, 1999). The <br />dominant economic water uses in the basin are for irrigated agriculture, industry (primarily <br />thermoelectric power generation), municipalities, and recreation. <br /> <br />The headwaters of the Yampa River originate on the eastern edge of the White River Plateau in north <br />central Colorado. The river is fed by munerous tributaries that drain the north slope of the plateau <br />and the western slope of the Sierra Madre, Park and Gore Ranges. The hydrology of the Yampa <br />River basin is typical of cold, snow-zone regions. Spring snowmelt nmoff generates most of the flow <br />in basin streams. As such, the basin nmoff hydrograph is highly seasonal, typically reaching a peak in <br />late spring. Base flow levels are typical by mid- to late-summer. Swnmer precipitation can be <br />important locally in small streams, especially in the western portions of the basin. <br /> <br />For this evaluation, the Yampa River basin was subdivided into seven major drainages. These <br />divisions were based on watershed boundaries and are intended to facilitate discussion of potential <br />storage opponunities on a geographic, rather than a political, basis. Table 1, Y t1J11{Ja Ri'U!r Basin <br />Drainag!s and Sigrzificant StrF!ams, lists the seven major drainages and the principal streams within each <br />drainage. Major drainages are shown in Figure 2, Y t1J11{Ja Rim- Basin Dra~. <br /> <br />2.1 WATER RESOURCES <br /> <br />Most of the water development in the Yampa River basin is for irrigated agriculture. There are <br />hundreds of irrigation ditches throughout the basin that divert Yampa River and tributary stream <br />flows. Most of the irrigation ditches were developed by individuals or private ditch companies. <br /> <br />Five water conservancy districts have been formed in the basin to promote the development of water <br />resources. The conservancy districts are the Upper Yampa Water Conservancy District, the Great <br />Northern Water Conservancy Distri<:;t, Yellow Jacket Water Conservancy District, Juniper Water <br />Conservancy District and Pot Hook Water Conservancy District. The Upper Yampa Water <br />Conservancy District covers most of Routt County and has been the most active in the basin. The <br />Great Northern Water Conservancy District includes Elkhead and Fortification Creeks in Moffat <br />County and has just recently been reconstituted (T. Wright Dickinson, personal communication, <br />1999). The Yellow Jacket Water Conservancy District includes the Morapos Creek and Milk Creek <br />drainages in southern Moffat County. This conservancy district has been diligent in maintaining its <br />conditional water rights and is very interested in assisting with the development of storage facilities <br />within its boundaries (Frank Cooley, personal communication, 1999). The Juniper Water <br />Conservancy District is located in Moffat County and covers the mainstem Yampa River downstream <br />of Craig to approximately Deerlodge Park. The Pot Hook Water Conservancy District is also located <br />in Moffat County and covers the lower portion of the Little Snake River drainage. <br /> <br />The Yampa River basin is considered undeveloped in terms of potential water use. River District <br />studies indicate that water use in the basin is only approximately 13 percent of basin yield (Ray <br />Tenney, personal communication, 1999). Most larger storage facilities are in the upper basin, <br />upstream of Steamboat Springs. Major basin impoundments include Steamboat Lake and Stagecoach, <br />Elkhead and Yamcolo Reservoirs. <br /> <br />Mon1f?neYY Watson Mining Group -- p.a Box 774018 -- StR4n1I:x1at Springs, CoIoradD 80477 -- (970) 879-6260 <br /> <br />w,WP/Djj/SmJJ _ s..J,(Dn(r Rpt. 11.17.9')) <br />/1/17/99SLW <br />