My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9489
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9489
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:30:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9489
Author
Mueller, G.
Title
The Role of Stocking in the Reestablishment and Augmentation of Native Fish in the Lower Colorado river Mainstream (1998-2002).
USFW Year
1998-2
USFW - Doc Type
03-288,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'I <br />I, <br />I <br />\-1 <br />] <br /> <br />I <br />f'l <br />I. I <br />r. <br />la <br />fl <br />,I <br />I <br />'I. ... <br />, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />habitat puts the species at a much higher predation risk. <br />Through a process of trial and error during the past two decades, managers are now stocking large natives to <br />increase their survival. Small native fish simply have not survived. While this improves short-term stocking <br />survival, it ignores or at least delays dealing with the predation issue. Current stocking programs have <br />reestablished or augmented relatively small populations of bonytail, razorback, and tlannelmouth suckers <br />between Davis and Parker Dams. All three species are better offthan they were a decade ago in this section of <br />the river. Unfortunately, bonytail and razorback sucker will only maintain a presence in the Colorado River <br />main stem through continued stocking and it remains to be seen if management agencies will make that long- <br />term commitment. <br />While the gains for the bonytail and razorback sucker have been difficult, the successful reintroduction of <br />tlannelmouth sucker highlights the ecological changes that have taken place and suggests this, and possibly <br />other channel oriented species (i.e., Gila robusta) could be established. In contrast, there is no evidence to <br />suggest we can expect similar recruitment or expansions for bonytail and razorback sucker. Their dependence <br />on slack water habitat leaves their young vulnerable to overwhelming predation. <br />Recovery in the main stem will only be accomplished with a dramatic decrease and possibly a total removal <br />of nonnative species. After ten years and over $6 million in expenditures to remove nonnative fish it appears <br />this philosophy is neither technically nor politically viable. In the meantime, stocking is the only alternative <br />available to insure these species don't disappear. The only viable option appears the creation and maintenance <br />of small, isolated refuge communities where these species have shown they can produce young. <br /> <br />VI <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.