Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />" <br />,I <br />tl <br />ft <br /> <br />{I <br />fa <br />fI <br />rt <br />.i..I~. <br />" <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />fl' <br />t <br /> <br />fl <br />( l <br />L.. . <br /> <br />:~I <br /> <br /> <br />1. I! <br /> <br />i.: ~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />i' <br />LI <br />tl <br />~I <br />I <br /> <br />Table of Contents <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................... iv <br /> <br />Introduction........................................................................................ ......................................................... 1 <br /> <br />1. Fish Surveys: Davis Dam to Lake Havasu ...........................................................................................2 <br /> <br />Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 2 <br /> <br />Methods......................... ...........,..... ................ .................... .......................... .......................... ..... .........3. <br /> <br />Results and Discussion.................. ................................................................ .......................... .............3 <br /> <br />Passive Netting......................... ....................................... ...... ....... ......................................... ......... 3 <br /> <br />Visual Surveys... ...................... ........... .......... ....... ...................................................... ....................5 <br /> <br />Light Trapping......................... ....................................... ...... ........... ............................... ...... .........6 <br /> <br />Distribution and Relative Abundance................................................ ..... ........................... ............9 <br />Physical Description of the Upper and Lower 40-krn River Reaches ............................................9 <br />Differences in Fish Distribution and Relative Abundance............................................................. 9 <br /> <br />Native Fish............................... .... ........ ........ ........ .................................................... .......... ............ 10 <br /> <br />Bonytail ............... ............... ....... ................................... ......................... ....................... ................. 10 <br /> <br />Flannelmouth Sucker................................. ............. .......... ........ .......... .................... ......... .............. 10 <br /> <br />Status and Existing Risks................. ...... ..................................... .................................. .............. ... 19 <br /> <br />2. Telemetry Studies...... ....... .............. ..... ....... ..... ........... ....... ......... ....... .... ... ..... .......... ........... ........ ....... ... 20 <br /> <br />Resident Fish Tests................. ...................................... .......... ......... .............................. ................ 20 <br /> <br />The Importance of Physiology and Behavior in Survival ..............................................................20 <br />Site Acclimation and Physical Conditioning Tests ...................................... ..................................21 <br /> <br />3. Stocking Risk Assessment.................................................................................................................... 22 <br /> <br />4. Bibliography for the Big River Fishes. ....... .......... ........ .......... ............. ..... ................... ........ .......... ....... 24 <br /> <br />5. The Role of Stocking in Management and Recovery ...........................................................................25 <br />Bonytail, Flannelmouth, and Razorback Suckers: Contrasting Survival Stories............................25 <br /> <br />Stocking Comparisons. ..... ........ .... ......... .............. .............. ... ..... ............. ..... ............ .......... ........ ....25 <br /> <br />Habitat Preference. ................. .... ................. ........ ......... ........ ........ .......... ........... .......... ..... ......... ....26 <br /> <br />Results of the Recent Endangered Fish Stocking Programs .................................................................28 <br /> <br />Recommendations....... ............. .......... .......................... ... ...... ..... .... ......... ... ..... .... ............... ........ .... 29 <br /> <br />Acknowledgments....................................... ............................................................................................... 30 <br /> <br />References Cited................................................................................ .......... ...............................................31 <br /> <br />Appendix. Summary tables offish numbers, average lengths, weights, and ranges ...................................35 <br /> <br />Tables <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />1.1 Sample composition (%) of fish collected in the Colorado River between Davis Dam and <br />Lake Havasu from October 1999 to May 2002 ................................................................................. 5 <br /> <br />11 <br />