Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />J <br /> <br />~..:-.-I. <br />-- <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />J.-~.. . <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />....'..1 <br />-. <br /> <br />~, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />Sources of Fish <br /> <br />Lake Powell Approximately 300 razorback suckers were transported from Ouray National Fish <br />Hatchery, Utah, to golf course ponds in Page, Arizona, on May 16, 1996. Fish originated from <br />"Green River" stock in 1993 and were designated "surplus" production from the upper basin <br />stocking augmentation program. Fish were held in golf course ponds to determine the ponds <br />suitability as grow-out facilities (Mueller and Wick 1997). Fish were scheduled to be released <br />into critical habitat areas of Lake Powell (USDOI 1996a & 1996b). <br /> <br />Thirty fish averaging 358 mm in length (335-402 mm) were captured from the golf course ponds <br />on May 3, 1997 (Appendix A). Fish were treated with stress reducing chemicals (salt, MS-222, <br />stress coat, and furacin) and transported by boat to Castle Creek Canyon, River Kilometer (RK) <br />72 on the San Juan Arm of Lake Powell. <br /> <br />Lake Mohave Lake Mohave were supplied by the Willow Beach National Fish Hatchery. Fish <br />were smaller, averaging 241 mm (201-290 mm, Appendix A). Fish were hauled in a tank treated <br />with stress reducing chemicals. In addition to sonic transmitters, the fish were also PIT (passive <br />integrated transponder) tagged. <br /> <br />Telemetry Equipment and Survey Techniques <br /> <br />Ultrasonic transmitters were chosen over radio transmitters for their ability to be detectable <br />regardless of depth, which in Lake Powell could exceed 100 m. Transmitters have been <br />successfully used on both small razorbacks suckers and bonytail (Gila eZegans) in Lake Mohave <br />(Marsh et al. 1996, Mueller et ale 1998). Transmitters (Sonotronics, model MT-95-2) used for <br />this study measured 9x36 mm, weighed 3 g in water, and had an estimated battery life of90 <br />days. Normal detection range was 500 m. <br /> <br />Previous attempts to surgically implant sonic transmitters in juvenile razorback suckers led to <br />high transmitter shedding and possibly mortality (Ryden 1997b, Mueller et al. 1998). We <br />wanted to test external attachment techniques that might reduce stress, increase survival, and <br />would eventually be shed. A literature review revealed various methods of attaching <br />transmitters. Saddle-mounted transmitters were tested on several surrogate species (white <br />suckers [Catostomus commersoni] and largemouth bass [Micropterus saZmoides]) without much <br />success (Winter et al. 1978) due to severe fungal and bacterial infections at the point of contact. <br />Various combinations of metal wire harn~sses were tested to determine if galvanistic corrosion <br />could be used as a release mechanism. Combinations of steel, aluminum, and copper proved <br />unreliable. <br />