Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />Little information is available regarding the movements and habitat use of early life stages of <br />razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus). Juveniles are rarely encountered in the wild (Minckley <br />1983, Minckley et al. 1991, Gutermuth et al. 1994, Modde 1996, Tyus 1997). Dispersal and <br />habitat use of stocked, juvenile razorbacks was studied in lakes Mohave and Powell during the <br />summer of 1997. Sonic transmitters (90 day) were externally attached to 55 fish, 27 were <br />released into Lake Mohave and 28 into Lake Powell. Half of each lot was held three days in <br />blocked coves to test if site acclimation influenced short-term dispersal rates. <br /> <br />Post stocking dispersal was rapid, widespread, and similar to earlier studies in Lake Mohave <br />(Mueller et al. 1998). Movement was more pronounced immediately after release and declined <br />with time. Maximum daily distance traveled by individuals released in Lake Powell averaged <br />>2 krn/d (0->7 krn/d) and daily movements averaged 347 mid (3-1,500 mid) for Lake Mohave <br />fish and 480 mid (3-1,800 mid) for Lake Powell. After the first week fish were typically found <br />backwaters and coves and >50% of the fish detected were found in cover. Prevalent cover types <br />in Lake Mohave and Powell included flooded tamarisk (48-86%), emergent vegetation <br />(Potamogeton & Najas spp.) (40/0% absent in Lake Powell), and rock cavities (12-14%). <br /> <br />Preliminary data suggests behavioral acclimation may influence short-term dispersal rates. Of <br />the 14 Lake Powell fish that remained in the study area for> 30 days, twice as many (64%) <br />represented fish held for 3 day than those simply released. The sample size was small and might <br />simply reflect normal variability, however, it's doubtful holding fish deter fish from remaining in <br />the general area and might encourage it. To few contacts were made in Lake Mohave to draw <br />any conclusions. <br /> <br />Sonic transmitters have been used successfully for tracking other fish species (Pelle and Paulson <br />1993, Marsh 1997, Mueller et al. 1998), however, they proved less effective on juvenile suckers <br />that typically were found using shallow, vegetative backwaters. These habitats greatly reduced <br />the effectiveness of sonic equipment. On the basis of our studies, we recommend that stocking <br />programs consider the following: <br /> <br />* Expand monitoring programs to sample shallow, flooded habitats (i.e., <2 m depths). <br />* Stock only fish larger than 30 cm in length. <br />* Investigate seasonal (autumn-winter) rather than year-round stocking. <br />*Examine reservoir fluctuation zones and how changes in reservoir elevation influences <br />predator population dynamics (i.e. densities, colonization rates). <br />* Use radio, rather than sonic transmitters for future juvenile telemetry studies. <br /> <br />111 <br />