My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8061
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8061
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:30:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8061
Author
Mueller, G. and P. Marsh.
Title
Post-Stocking Dispersal, Habitat Use, and Behavioral Acclimation of Juvenile Razorback Suckers (
USFW Year
1998.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The average maximum distance traveled by 21 fish was more than 2,080 mid (range 400-5,000 <br />m/day). One fish (#438) traveled a total distance of 5 kmld. Juvenile fish frequented and moved <br />between Castle Creek Canyon and Mike's Canyon (RK 73-79). The average observed range was <br />2.2 kIn (0.1 to 7.4 km). We were unable to determine the actual dispersal range since we lost <br />contact with 50% of the study fish. <br /> <br /> 100 <br /> 80 <br />- <br />"$. <br />- 60 <br />>> <br />u <br />c: <br />II <br />= <br />Cl" 40 <br />II <br />... <br />'- <br /> 20 <br /> 0 <br /> <br />'_Tamarisk fIB Boulder . Pond weed I <br /> <br /> <br />Lake Mohave <br />(N=33) <br /> <br />Lake Powell <br />(N=77) <br /> <br />Figure 5. Cover used by juvenile razorback suckers released into lakes Mohave and Powell, <br />May through July 1997. <br /> <br />Lake Mohave Fish rapidly dispersed and we only maintained contact with one fish (#437) past <br />the third week. Fish #337 traveled 7.1 kIn in one day. On the fourth day we contacted and <br />followed fish #238 moving at a rate more than 3 kmlhour. It was traveling up the middle of the <br />reservoir and by mid-day had moved an astonishing rate of20.5 kmlday. The transmitter <br />traveled nearly 63 kIn, through the pelagic zones in Lake Mohave during the next four days, <br />suggesting it might have been eaten by a striped bass. <br /> <br />Equipment Performance and Survey Design <br /> <br />Signal reception was best under calm conditions and when the transmitter was located in open <br />water. At times signals could be heard at distances of 1-2 kIn. Wind, rain, wave action, and <br />watercraft traffic interfered with listening and reduced detection range. The disappearance of <br />nearly 80% of our transmitters in Lake Mohave caused us to examine if, and to what extent, <br />aquatic vegetation might interfere with signal strength. We found if transmitters were placed <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.