Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The average maximum distance traveled by 21 fish was more than 2,080 mid (range 400-5,000 <br />m/day). One fish (#438) traveled a total distance of 5 kmld. Juvenile fish frequented and moved <br />between Castle Creek Canyon and Mike's Canyon (RK 73-79). The average observed range was <br />2.2 kIn (0.1 to 7.4 km). We were unable to determine the actual dispersal range since we lost <br />contact with 50% of the study fish. <br /> <br /> 100 <br /> 80 <br />- <br />"$. <br />- 60 <br />>> <br />u <br />c: <br />II <br />= <br />Cl" 40 <br />II <br />... <br />'- <br /> 20 <br /> 0 <br /> <br />'_Tamarisk fIB Boulder . Pond weed I <br /> <br /> <br />Lake Mohave <br />(N=33) <br /> <br />Lake Powell <br />(N=77) <br /> <br />Figure 5. Cover used by juvenile razorback suckers released into lakes Mohave and Powell, <br />May through July 1997. <br /> <br />Lake Mohave Fish rapidly dispersed and we only maintained contact with one fish (#437) past <br />the third week. Fish #337 traveled 7.1 kIn in one day. On the fourth day we contacted and <br />followed fish #238 moving at a rate more than 3 kmlhour. It was traveling up the middle of the <br />reservoir and by mid-day had moved an astonishing rate of20.5 kmlday. The transmitter <br />traveled nearly 63 kIn, through the pelagic zones in Lake Mohave during the next four days, <br />suggesting it might have been eaten by a striped bass. <br /> <br />Equipment Performance and Survey Design <br /> <br />Signal reception was best under calm conditions and when the transmitter was located in open <br />water. At times signals could be heard at distances of 1-2 kIn. Wind, rain, wave action, and <br />watercraft traffic interfered with listening and reduced detection range. The disappearance of <br />nearly 80% of our transmitters in Lake Mohave caused us to examine if, and to what extent, <br />aquatic vegetation might interfere with signal strength. We found if transmitters were placed <br /> <br />11 <br />