My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8249
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8249
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:28:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8249
Author
Modde, T., W. J. Miller and R. Anderson.
Title
Determination of Habitat Availability, Habitat Use, and Flow Needs of Endangered Fished in the Yampa River Between August and October.
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
Project #CAP-9,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />(flow/habitat relationship) can be accurately predicted using hydraulic simulation models (Bovee 1982). <br />However, due to several concerns related to estimation of suitability curves (i.e., few observations, life <br />stage dependency, concerns regarding whether observations truly reflect suitable habitat [Tyus 1992], and <br />other criticisms of the PHABSIM approach [Stanford 1994], etc.), the primary means for determining the <br />impacts of low flows was based on estimates of change in river channel characteristics (curve break <br />analysis). In our approach, the use of weighted useable areas estimates for RHABSIM was used only as a <br />comparison to the stream profile approach. <br /> <br />The curve break analysis is a threshold approach using hydraulic simulation that was used to estimate <br />channel characteristics (mesohabitat availability) at various baseflow scenarios. The application of this <br />approach assumes that the Yampa River channel is in equilibrium. Telemetry data was used to identify <br />which mesohabitat types (runs, riffles, or pools) were important to Colorado pikeminnow Ptychocheilus <br />lucius and humpback chub Gila cypha. In addition, riffles were emphasized in the analysis because of <br />their importance to invertebrate production (Brown and Brussock 1991) as well as habitat use (as <br />discussed in Chapter 4). Guidance from the RIP expert panel (Drs. Stephen Ross, University of Southern <br />Mississippi; Robert White, Montana Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, and William Trush, <br />McBain and Trush, Inc. and Humboldt State University) during two meetings in March 1997 and January <br />1998 emphasized the importance of riffles in the analysis because they are the most sensitive mesohabitat <br />to reductions in discharge. The curve break analysis was used to define the flow below which the greatest <br />loss in habitat availability occurred for each mesohabitat type (i.e. maximum degradation in stream profile <br />of the mesohabitat type). The rationale behind the curve break analysis is: 1) native fishes, including <br />listed species, in the Yampa River are adapted to local channel characteristics as they have existed <br />historically, and 2) that baseflows below the curve break flow represent the greatest loss of habitat and is, <br />therefore, detrimental to recovery of the fishes. However, because variability in low flows as well as high <br />flows is recognized as essential in maintaining native fish communities (Poff et al. 1997), we recognize <br />that endangered fishes have maintained persistent populations in the Yampa River despite periods of very <br />low flow. Therefore, the recommendation ofthis report is to maintain flows above levels that were <br />identified by habitat availability simulations integrated with an understanding of variability within the <br />context of the historical flow record. <br /> <br />The format for this report is set up by chapter to address the specific objectives ofthe study. This chapter <br />describes the purpose and approach taken in this study and the next chapter provides a description of the <br />hydrology and physical characteristics of the Yampa River study area. Chapter 3 presents analysis of the <br />physical characteristics of the Yampa River study area and provides simulations of channel features for <br /> <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.