Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(flow/habitat relationship) can be accurately predicted using hydraulic simulation models (Bovee 1982). <br />However, due to several concerns related to estimation of suitability curves (i.e., few observations, life <br />stage dependency, concerns regarding whether observations truly reflect suitable habitat [Tyus 1992], and <br />other criticisms of the PHABSIM approach [Stanford 1994], etc.), the primary means for determining the <br />impacts of low flows was based on estimates of change in river channel characteristics (curve break <br />analysis). In our approach, the use of weighted useable areas estimates for RHABSIM was used only as a <br />comparison to the stream profile approach. <br /> <br />The curve break analysis is a threshold approach using hydraulic simulation that was used to estimate <br />channel characteristics (mesohabitat availability) at various baseflow scenarios. The application of this <br />approach assumes that the Yampa River channel is in equilibrium. Telemetry data was used to identify <br />which mesohabitat types (runs, riffles, or pools) were important to Colorado pikeminnow Ptychocheilus <br />lucius and humpback chub Gila cypha. In addition, riffles were emphasized in the analysis because of <br />their importance to invertebrate production (Brown and Brussock 1991) as well as habitat use (as <br />discussed in Chapter 4). Guidance from the RIP expert panel (Drs. Stephen Ross, University of Southern <br />Mississippi; Robert White, Montana Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, and William Trush, <br />McBain and Trush, Inc. and Humboldt State University) during two meetings in March 1997 and January <br />1998 emphasized the importance of riffles in the analysis because they are the most sensitive mesohabitat <br />to reductions in discharge. The curve break analysis was used to define the flow below which the greatest <br />loss in habitat availability occurred for each mesohabitat type (i.e. maximum degradation in stream profile <br />of the mesohabitat type). The rationale behind the curve break analysis is: 1) native fishes, including <br />listed species, in the Yampa River are adapted to local channel characteristics as they have existed <br />historically, and 2) that baseflows below the curve break flow represent the greatest loss of habitat and is, <br />therefore, detrimental to recovery of the fishes. However, because variability in low flows as well as high <br />flows is recognized as essential in maintaining native fish communities (Poff et al. 1997), we recognize <br />that endangered fishes have maintained persistent populations in the Yampa River despite periods of very <br />low flow. Therefore, the recommendation ofthis report is to maintain flows above levels that were <br />identified by habitat availability simulations integrated with an understanding of variability within the <br />context of the historical flow record. <br /> <br />The format for this report is set up by chapter to address the specific objectives ofthe study. This chapter <br />describes the purpose and approach taken in this study and the next chapter provides a description of the <br />hydrology and physical characteristics of the Yampa River study area. Chapter 3 presents analysis of the <br />physical characteristics of the Yampa River study area and provides simulations of channel features for <br /> <br />18 <br />