Laserfiche WebLink
<br />loss or habitat isolation due to flow reductions (flow/habitat relationship) can be accurately predicted <br />usirrghydraulic simulation models (Bovee 1982). However, due to concerns related to estimation of <br />suitability curves (Le., few observations, life stage dependency, concerns regarding whether observations <br />truly reflect suitable habitat [Tyus 1992], and other criticisms of the PHABSIM approach [Stanford <br />1994], etc.), the primary basis for developing low flow needs were changes in river channel <br />characteristics (curve break analysis). In our approach, the use of weighted useable areas estimates for <br />RHABSIM was used only as a comparison to the curve break analysis approach. <br /> <br />The curve break analysis is a threshold approach using hydraulic simulation that was used to estimate <br />channel characteristics at various baseflow scenarios. The application of this approach assumes that the <br />Yampa River channel is in equilibrium. Our approach used telemetry data to identify which mesohabitat <br />types (runs, riffles, or pools) were important to Colorado pikeminnow Ptychocheilus lucius and <br />humpback chub Gila cypha. In addition, riffles were emphasized in the analysis because of their <br />importance to invertebrate production (Brown and Brussock 1991) as well as habitat use (as discussed in <br />Chapter 4). Guidance from the RIP expert panel (Drs. Stephen Ross, University of Southern Mississippi; <br />Robert White, Montana Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, and William Trush, McBain and <br />Trush, Inc. and Humboldt State University) during two meetings in March 1997 and January 1998 <br />emphasized the importance of riffles in the analysis because they are the most sensitive mesohabitat to <br />reductions in discharge. The curve break analysis was used to define the flow below which the greatest <br />loss in habitat availability occurred for each mesohabitat type (Le. maximum degradation in stream profile <br />of the mesohabitat type). The rationale behind the curve break analysis is: 1) native fishes, including <br />listed species, in the Yampa River are adapted to local channel characteristics as they have existed <br />historically, and 2) that baseflows below the curve break flow represent the greatest loss of habitat and is, <br />therefore, detrimental to recovery of the fishes. However, because variability in low flows as well as high <br />flows is recognized as essential in maintaining native fish communities (Poff et al. 1997), we recognize <br />that endangered fishes have maintained persistent populations in the Yampa River despite periods of very <br />low flow. Therefore, the recommendation of this report is to maintain flows above levels that were <br />identified by habitat availability simulations integrated with an understanding of variability within the <br />context of the historical flow record. <br /> <br />Habitat Availability <br /> <br />Testing the physical properties of the six study strata showed differences: however, only wetted width <br />indicated a geographical pattern which segregated the three Yampa Canyon strata from the three upper <br /> <br />9 <br />