Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Water entered the wetland at a much lower discharge through the inlet channel <br />maintained by the ONWR to deliver water into the wetland. Prior to 1994, the inlet <br />channel elevation was 1417.6 mamsl and estimated discharge of approximately 240 <br />m3/s would be required to deliver water into the wetland. However, the bottom of the <br />wetland has an elevation of 1417.0 mamsl so that if the inlet canal is lowered through <br />dredging, water could access the wetland at a slightly lower discharge. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Overbank connection between the Green River and Old Charley Wash in 1993 <br />occurred at a discharge between 405 m3/s and 455 m3/s. No observations were made <br />on the date of inundation, so the specific discharge causing inundation is uncertain. In <br />1995, it was observed that flows began inundating the river levee on May 23 (personal <br />observation). Estimated Green River flows at Ouray (Jensen gage on the Green River <br />plus Ashley and Brush creek gage records) were 454 m3/s on May 22. Estimating one <br />day delivery time between Ouray and Jensen (about 100 river kilometers), the flows in <br />1993 that inundated Old Charley Wash were probably closer to the higher range of the <br />estimate. Although the inlet and outlet structures allow water to enter Old Charley <br />Wash at flows approximating 240 m3/s, overbank flooding does not occur until flows are <br />almost twice this high. Connection of Old Charley Wash occurs at a lower discharge <br />than the flood stage (524 m3/sec). Irving and Burdick (1995) identified the largest <br />terrace and depression wetlands in the Green River between Flaming Gorge Dam and <br />the confluence of the Colorado River. Among those wetlands listed, Old Charley Wash <br />was smaller and inundated at lower flows than many other depression wetlands. A <br />more thorough discussion of floodplain distribution and relationship of flow to floodplain <br />connectivity is found in Irving and Burdick (1995) and Flo Engineering (1996). <br /> <br />MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS <br /> <br />Floodplain habitat in the middle Green River is used by razorback sucker during <br />high spring river flows. Use of this habitat may be associated with warmer water and <br />higher prey density. Spawning migrations of razorback sucker seemed to be initiated <br />primarily by rising discharge. Tag-recapture and telemetry data showed that <br />posts pawned fish moved to tributary outlets and the vicinity of the Ouray wetland <br />complex. Thus, timing of spring flows seems to be an important cue for congregating <br />spawning adults and postspawning movement. When available, the invertebrate-rich <br />floodplain habitat created by high flows provides important postspawning habitat for <br />immature and adult razorback sucker. High flows and the duration of flows which <br />maintain connectivity of the river and floodplain are, thus, important attributes in <br />defining quality and quantity of spring habitat for all life stages of the razorback sucker. <br /> <br />Inundated floodplain habitat provides an important nutrient source to both off- <br />channel and mainchannel riverine environments. High nutrients produce standing <br />stocks of invertebrates much higher than mainchannel habitat. The high invertebrate <br />production, elevated temperature, and cover provided by abundant aquatic vegetation <br />growth in floodplain wetlands provide excellent environments for growth and survival of <br /> <br />29 <br />