Laserfiche WebLink
<br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Historically, floodplain habitat in low-gradient reaches of the middle Green River <br />was inundated regularly during peak spring flows. Bankfull flows at the Ouray National <br />Wildlife Refuge averaged 575 m3ts (Flo Engineering 1996) and were historically <br />exceeded 2 of every 3 years (USGS Jensen Gage data between 1947 and 1962). After <br />closure of Flaming Gorge Dam, bankfull flows were exceeded only 1 in every 4 years <br />(U.S.G.S. Jensen Gage data between 1964 and 1992). Reduced peak flows since the <br />closure of Flaming Gorge Dam have altered main-channel morphology (Andrews 1986), <br />influenced the chronology of the hydrograph (Tyus and Karp 1989), and reduced <br />floodplain connectivity with the Green River (Irving and Burdick 1995). During the high <br />spring river flows, adult razorback sucker Xyrauchen texanus have been collected from <br />floodplain habitat (Tyus and Karp 1989, 1991). The significance of floodplain habitat to <br />the species biology is unknown. High spring flow events have been correlated with <br />recruitment in adult razorback sucker (Modde et al. 1996), but the relationship is <br />undefined. Based on anecdotal and observational inferences that floodplain habitat <br />was important to both early and adult life stages of razorback sucker and Colorado <br />squawfish (Tyus and Karp 1989, 1990), this project was designed to evaluate river-use <br />patterns by adult razorback sucker during the spring in the middle Green River, initiate <br />pilot studies to evaluate potential benefits of floodplain wetlands to immature razorback <br />sucker, and define flows necessary to connect Old Charley Wash wetland to the Green <br />River. Specific objectives of this project were to 1) describe movement and habitat use <br />patterns of adult razorback sucker, 2) describe the growth and survival of immature <br />razorback sucker in wetlands relative to main-channel habitat, and 3) determine flows <br />required to inundate Old Charley Wash. Because of the unrelated nature of the above <br />studies, this report has been organized into separate chapters. <br /> <br />STUDY AREA <br /> <br />The study area included the Green River between the lower end of West Branch <br />(RK 391, river kilometer upstream from the confluence of the Green and Colorado <br />rivers) to its confluence with the Yampa River (RK 555) (Figure 1). This reach <br />represents the upstream portion of the longest, low-gradient section of the Green River <br />below Flaming Gorge Dam occupied by endangered fishes and has the greatest area of <br />floodplain habitat in the Green River drainage (Irving and Burdick 1995). The <br />magnitude of spring flows through the study area are determined by the relatively <br />natural hydrograph of the Yampa River and summer flows of the Green River regulated <br />by Flaming Gorge Dam. The presence of Flaming Gorge Dam has reduced both <br />variation and magnitude of the annual hydrograph in the Green River (Tyus and Karp <br />1991), reducing the historic width of the river channel and its ability to transport <br />sediment (Andrews 1986). In addition to physical changes in the historic habitat, the <br /> <br />9 <br />