Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />Duchesne River Adult fish monitoring <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />The Duchesne River is the primary tributary receiving flows from the southeastern <br />watersheds of the Uintah Mountains and empties into the Green River near Ouray, Utah. <br />Historically, the annual water yield of the Duchesne River was comparable to those of the Yampa <br />and White rivers, both of which support resident populations of endangered fishes (Tyus and Karp <br />1989, Lenstch et al. 2000). Whereas average annual flows ofthe Yampa and White Rivers have <br />not been drastically altered, the flows of the Duchesne River have been reduced from historical <br />flows of over 768,470 acre-ft to approximately 399,694 acre-ft (CHM2 Hill 997). Following <br />reduced flows, the morphology of the lower Duchesne River has changed dramatically since the <br />late nineteenth century becoming narrower and less sinuous (Brink and Schmidt 1996). <br />In the last 20 years, razorback sucker and Colorado pikeminnow have been captured <br />regularly in the lower Duchesne River (Archer et al. 1986, Cranney 1994). Based on the presence <br />of "ripe females with strippable eggs", Archer et al. (1986) suggested that razorback sucker may <br />spawn in the lower 2.5 mi of the Duchesne River. Cranney (1994) observed razorback sucker and <br />Colorado pikeminnow as far upstream as river miles (rmi)12.0 and 13.6, respectively, and <br />reported angler catches of pike minnow as far upstream as rmi 41.2. The presence of fishes <br />upstream of the confluence implied that the Duchesne River, despite alterations in flow and <br />channel complexity, remains an important environment for endangered fishes. <br />The one year survey by Cranney (1994), and the anecdotal information he cites in his <br />report are the only data that reference distribution of endangered fish in the Duchesne River above <br />critical habitat. The undefined role of the Duchesne River to endangered fishes, together with the <br />knowledge that Colorado pikeminnow reside in rivers of similar size gave impetus for the <br />Recovery Implementation Program to initiate this study. In addition, proposed development of the <br />Central Utah Projects, Uintah-Upalco and Uinta Basin Replacement Project, required a biological <br />opinion relative to flow needs for endangered fishes in the Duchesne River. The purpose of this <br />study is to provide information on the distribution, spawning, and temporal use of the Duchesne <br />River by endangered fishes. The specific objectives of this study were to determine: 1) the <br />seasonal use of adult and subadult Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker in the Duchesne <br />River, and 2) the extent to which adult and subadult Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker <br /> <br />1 <br />