My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8214
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:28:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8214
Author
Modde, T., D. Irving and R. Anderson.
Title
Habitat Availability and Habitat Use of Endangered Fishes in the Yampa River during Baseflow Periods.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Vernal, Utah and Grand Junction, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />sites would not be used to estimate habitat availability, but would provide insight into developing <br />criteria as to what riffle depth adult Colorado squawfish can pass. If this occurs, we will be able to <br />adjust the 1.0 maximum depth criterion either up or down. A slight adjustment in the maximum <br />depth value could result in a significant change in suitable discharge. <br /> <br />Based on the data from 1996, it appears that some, though isolated, adult Colorado squawfish <br />habitat is maintained in most clusters at flows as low as 1 cfs. At flow between 80 and 100 cfs, it <br />appears that adult squawfish habitat is maintained at about 70% of the median base flow. In regard <br />to the fish passage question, it appears that flow of 160 to 185 cfs would allow fish movement over <br />70% of the riffles measured. Thus, it appears that site isolation may occur prior to the reduction in <br />habitat availability. Flows that may restrict fish movement between pools at sites sampled in 1996 <br />appear before substantial declines in habitat availability. Nontheless, any interpretation made in <br />this report are based soley data collected in 1996 and is subject to change or modification based on <br />the collection of a data in 1997. <br /> <br />LITERATURE CITED <br /> <br />Bovee, K.D., and R. Milhous. 1978. Hydraulic simulation in instream flow studies: theory and <br />techniques. Instream flow paper No.5. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-78/33. Fort <br />Collins, CO. <br /> <br />Gordon, N.D., T.A. McMahon, and B.L. Finlayson. 1992. Steam hydrology: an introduction for <br />ecologists. Wiley and Sons. <br /> <br />Hydrosphere Resource Consultants. 1995. Yampa River basin recommended alternative detailed <br />feasibility study. Final Report. Submitted to Colorado River Conservation District. Glenwood <br />Springs, CO. <br /> <br />Miller, W.H., D.L. Archer, H.M. Tyus and R.M. McNatt. 1982. Yampa River fishes study. Final Report <br />for Memorandum of Understanding 14-16-0006-81-931(IA), U.S. National Park Service. U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service, Salt Lake City, UT. <br /> <br />Miller, W.J., and D.E. Rees. 1997. Colorado squawfish habitat use and movement during summer low <br />flow in the Yampa River upstream of Cross Mountain Canyon. Annual Report submitted to <br />Colorado River Water Conservation District. Glenwood Springs, CO. <br /> <br />Modde, T., and G. Smith. 1995. Flow recommendations for endangered fishes in the Yampa River. Final <br />Report submitted to the Recovery Implementation Program for the Recovery of Endangered <br />Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, CO. <br /> <br />Nesler, Thomas P. 1995. Interactions between endangered fishes and introduced gamefishes in the <br />Yampa River, Colorado, 1987-1991. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Aquatic Research Section, Ft. <br /> <br />46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.