My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8214
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:28:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8214
Author
Modde, T., D. Irving and R. Anderson.
Title
Habitat Availability and Habitat Use of Endangered Fishes in the Yampa River during Baseflow Periods.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Vernal, Utah and Grand Junction, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Strata 6 <br /> <br />Clusters 2 (rm 62.8) and 3 (rm 63.5) <br /> <br />Nine cross sections were surveyed in these two clusters along with depth profiles across two <br />shallow riffles. The length of the reach was 2, 646 feet. At 132.2 cfs, the mean flow measured in <br />the field (Table 2), shallow runs were 45%, shallow pools were 38%, and deep runs were 14% of <br />the total surface area of the reach (Appendix 2, Table 6). No Class I pool habitat was found at any <br />flow. Shallow habitats dominate this reach at flows below 400 cfs. The primary habitat available <br />for adult CS in this half mile of river is the deep run. <br /> <br />Cluster 7 (rm 73.3) <br /> <br />Five cross sections were done in this cluster. The sequence was 1,205 feet in length. Discharge <br />determined by field measurements was 287 cfs (Appendix 2, Table 7). The downstream control <br />cross section had to be located in a spilt channel, with 267 cfs in the main channel or right bank <br />(looking upstream) and 20 cfs flowing in the smaller channel around a small island. Flow was in a <br />single channel for all other cross sections in this sequence. <br /> <br />The run in this sequence was slow, deep and had a maximum depth of7.3 feet (cross section 3) <br />at the field measured flow (288 cfs). This deep run was at the base of a cliff just downstream of a <br />bend in the river. The slope of this run was flat and the width/depth ratio was low. A drop in flow <br />from 288 cfs to one cfs lowers WSL by 2.5 feet at cross section 3. At one cfs, much of this run <br />modeled to be a Class II pool because depths were still up to 4 feet. The Class II pool is the <br />dominant habitat type of this sequence at flows between one and 40 cfs (Appendix 2, Table 2). <br />Percentage of usable habitat increased as flow drop below 60 to one cfs, due to expanded influence <br />of the Class II pool. At flows over 60 cfs, shallow runs are the most common habitat type. <br /> <br />Cluster 11 (rm 78.8) <br /> <br />There were six cross sections surveyed at this sequence. The reach length was 1,772 ft, and <br />flow measured in the field was 134.9 cfs (Appendix 2, Table 8). The control cross section was <br />located upstream of a steep shallow riffle and upstream an exposed bar that split flow into two <br />channels. Flow in the channel left of the bar was 78 cfs (63%) and was 46 cfs (37%) on the right <br />(looking upstream). Cross section 2 was located 380 ft above the control and just upstream of a <br />small flowing side channel (13.5 cfs). The flow of this side channel rejoined the main channel at <br />the base of the riffle below the control. This was the only option for a control site in this cluster and <br />in spite of the complex channel morphology, the control cross-section modeled without problems. <br />Flow was confined within a single channel in all other cross sections in this sequence. <br /> <br />Cross sections 2 and 3 described the lower and the middle of the run, respectively. The distance <br />between cross sections 2 and 3 is 850 feet and the increase in water surface elevation was 0.03 feet. <br />This run maintained width and depth at decreased flows and at one cfs, 42% of the sequence was <br /> <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.