Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 150 <br />~ <br />.s:::. <br />'0 100 <br />s: <br />C <br />ell <br />QJ <br />::2 I <br /> 50 I.. /. <br /> .. <br /> ~/r/ <br /> ./ <br /> ; /-/ <br /> 0 <br /> 0 100 200 300 400 <br /> <br /> 150 <br />~ <br />.s:::. <br />'0 100 <br />s: <br />C <br />ell <br />QJ <br />::2 <br /> 50 <br /> <br />-.) <br />D <br /> <br />.s:::. <br />'0 j <br />'5 100 . <br />:> ! <br />~ t----- <br /> <br />::2 501 I <br />II I <br />lr--t <br />o -r--...--..-+-..-1~.- <br /> <br />Width Versus Discharge Relationship <br />Combined RM 23.9,45.5, 510, 53.5, 54.0 (n=28) <br /> <br />200 <br /> <br />200 <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />... .c._____,. . <br /> <br /> <br />150 <br /> <br />o -,- <br />o <br /> <br />400 <br /> <br />500 <br /> <br />200 <br /> <br />300 <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />Width Versus Discharge Relationship <br />Strata 2 Cluster 1 RM 23.9 (n=6) <br /> <br />200 <br /> <br /> <br />400 <br /> <br />.--.. i <br />~_ 300 .+- <br />- I <br />.s:::. i <br />'01 <br />s: 200 : <br />c <br />ell <br />QJ <br />::2 <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />500 <br /> <br />, , <br />:/ <br />o ~ <br />o <br /> <br />Discharge (cfs) <br /> <br />Width Versus Discharge Relationship <br /> <br />Strata 3 Cluster 1 RM 45.5 (n=6) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />-.- -~-.-r'-.--------------,~ <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />200 <br /> <br />500 <br /> <br />300 <br /> <br />400 <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />Width Versus Discharge Relationship <br />Strata 3 Cluster 3 RM 51.0 (n=4) <br /> <br />-t -------- ~ <br /> / ~ <br /> .... <br /> ~ I <br />...-- ~--- <br /> ~/ <br /> 1;/.~ ________n_____ <br /> -1.--- <br /> I <br /> / .. .... .... n. <br />. <br />" I <br /> .. ..... . ..... --~----j <br /> I <br /> <br />r <br />t <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />200 300 <br />Discharge (cfs) <br /> <br />500 <br /> <br />400 <br /> <br />Figure l2.-The mean river width versus discharge relationship at modeled t10ws for five habitat clusters in strata 2,3 and 4, Yampa River, <br />Colorado, 1996. <br />