Laserfiche WebLink
<br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Purpose <br /> <br />This document proposes flow recommendations (as measured at the Maybell <br />gage) needed to recover Colorado squawfish Ptychocheilus lucius, humpback chub, <br />Gila cypha, bonytail, G. elegans, and razorback sucker, Xyrauchen texanus, in waters <br />influenced by Yampa River flows. In addition to the four listed species, the Yampa <br />River drainage has some of the last abundant populations of flannelmouth sucker, <br />Catostomus discobolus, and roundtail chub, G. robusta. As the last major, <br />unregulated tributary in the Upper Colorado River Basin, the Yampa River provides <br />flows that support the largest natural populations of Colorado squawfish and razorback <br />sucker in the Colorado River Basin. The approach taken in this document is to use <br />the best data and science available to define the hydrological needs of endangered <br />fishes. It is not the purpose of this document to define the mechanisms to achieve the <br />recommendations proposed, but rather, to use existing knowledge to define water <br />needs for recovering and maintaining habitat for endangered fishes in Yampa and <br />Green rivers. We recognize that sufficient flows to meet the following <br />recommendations and projected water depletions may not always be available and <br />that, at times, limitations will be placed on the implementation of the recommendations <br />during some times of the year. A discussion of these limitations is found in the section <br />that summarizes flow recommendations. <br /> <br />The recommendations proposed in this document update the 1990 interim <br />Yampa River flow recommendations presented by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />(USFWS 1990). The interim recommendations were based. 011 a review of existing <br />biological data on endangered fishes by Tyus and Karp (1989). That approach was <br />selected following the failure of physical habitat modeling (IFIM) to demonstrate <br />predictive cause-and-effect relationships with the distribution and abundance of <br />endangered fishes in the Green River Basin (Rose and Hahn 1989). The <br />recommendations proposed in this document are heavily based on the 'biological . <br />information- presented by Tyus and Karp (1989), but. also include information provided <br />by the RIP (Recovery Implementation Program for the Recovery of Endangered Fishes <br />in the Upper Colorado River Basin) instream flow review (Stanford 1994),' Comparison <br />of historical and virgin flow estimates of the Yampa River (Maybell), and published <br />ecological principles. .' ' <br /> <br />Study Area <br /> <br />Originating in the White River National Forest on the western slope of the . <br />Rocky Mountains, the Yampa River is the largest tributary of the Green River (Figure <br />1). The greatest abundance of endangered native fishes in the Yampa River occurs <br />downstream of (potamon-rithron transitio'n region of the river) Hayden, Colorado. The <br />upper reach of the Yampa River occupied by endangered fishes flows through low <br />gradient agricultural valleys with the exception of Juniper (RM 90.5 - 88.2) and Cross <br />Mountain (RM 58.5 - 55.2) canyons prior to entering the high gradient Yampa Canyon <br />(RM 46.7 - 0). <br /> <br />1 <br />