My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8117
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:27:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8117
Author
Modde, T. and G. Smith.
Title
Flow Recommendations for Endangered Fishes in the Yampa River.
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Poff and Ward (1990) suggested that in highly variable/unpredictable flow <br />regimes abiotic factors dictate ecological processes, whereas, under more benign or <br />predictable flow regimes biotic factors such as competition or predation are more <br />influential. In this respect, species adaptable to variable environments will persist in <br />the face of environmental heterogeneity and disturbance, whereas, others (Le. <br />nonnative species) may colonize but will not persist. Conversely, under moderated <br />conditions biotic interactions become more determinate and nonnative species have a <br />greater opportunity to persist. In California streams, Baltz and Moyle (1993) stated <br />that the maintenance of native fish assemblages required maintaining natural flow <br />patterns which included the high winter floods and the low summer baseflows. <br /> <br />Several studies support the concept that flow variation is important to the <br />maintenance of native fishes in western rivers and streams (e.g. Hawkins and Nesler <br />1991, Baltz and Moyle 1993, Minckley and Meffe 1987). Much of this literature relates <br />to the importance of peak flows to the persistence of native species. Ind~d, peak <br />flows seem to be the dominant factors influencing spawning migration, spaWning, <br />larval transport to nursery sites and adult habitat in the Yampa River (fyus and Karp <br />1989). Very little information exists relative to the importance of baseflows on native <br />fish communities. Although some studies have indicated the importance of baseflows <br />to native species in intermittent streams (Deacon 1988, Paloumpis 1958), these <br />studies are not applicable to the permanent flowing Yampa River. Poff and Allan <br />(1995) evaluated fish assemblages in various flow regimes in midwestern streams and <br />rivers and concluded that fluctuations in baseflow can influence persistence among <br />ftshes. <br /> <br />Data clearly demonstrate the relationship of natural flow patterns to the <br />biology of endangered fishes in the Yampa River (Tyus and Karp 1989), however, the <br />quantity of flows and variation necessary to maintain rare native species within and <br />among years has not been experimentally defined. Although correlations of fish <br />declines with changes in the hydrograph have been demonstrated (e.g. Walker and <br />Thoms 19Q.3, Modde et al. accepted for publication) the specific causal factors <br />associated with native fish declines have not been clearly demonstrated. Nonetheless, <br />the dependence of native fish assemblages on a variable hydrograph have been <br />clearly demonstrated in arid landscape rivers and streams. As discussed by Stanford <br />(1994), no universal quantitative method of determining specific habitat needs (Le. flow <br />recommendations) of fishes exists and an adaptive management approach using the <br />best information available represents the most desirable approach. Stanford (1994) <br />further recommended that, due to the "critical" nature of flows and habitat in the <br />Yampa River, and its importance to the recovery of endangered fishes in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service interim flows should be <br />adopted and evaluated. However, Stanford (1994) cautioned that the environmental <br />baseline needed to be revised and that flow recommendations not be based on <br />monthly averages because of the need to incorporate instantaneous variation which <br />was a "very important component of river ecology". <br /> <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.