Laserfiche WebLink
<br />suitable habitats for larval fishes than main channel habitats in spring and summer. They found <br />cladocerans and copepods much more abundant in the open water habitats of Old Charley Wash <br />and Wyasket Lake (mean of>45 organisms/l) than backwaters and main channel river habitats (< <br />1.0 organisms/I) between June and September. In a laboratory study, Papoulias and Minckley <br />(1990) observed significant starvation mortality of larval razorback sucker when Artemia <br />densities were less than 50 zooplankters/l. In experimental ponds, no differences in survival of <br />razorback sucker larvae occurred when prey densities ranged between 13 and 43 organisms/l, <br />however, significant differences occurred in fish growth between prey densities (Papoulias and <br />Minckley 1992). <br />Welcomme (1985) reported that zooplankton densities are higher in floodplain <br />wetlands/lakes than in main channel habitats. He concluded that zooplankton densities were <br />influenced more by water volume than turbidity, dissolved oxygen, or conductivity. Zooplankton <br />densities in Old Charley Wash were one or two orders of magnitude greater than reported in main <br />channel habitats in the Green River, however, densities in the wetland decreased with depth (i.e. <br />time). The decrease in zooplankton was coincident with observed rapid aquatic macrophyte <br />growth. Macrophytic growth, particularly Polygonum sp. around the margins (mostly depths < 1 <br />m) of the wetland and Potamogeton pectinatus in the deeper (> 1 m) areas in the middle ofthe <br />wetland increased rapidly in July. Bonetto (1975, in Welcomme 1985) observed an inverse <br />relationship of zooplankton numbers with macrophyte density in floodplain habitats of the <br />Parana River. McVea and Boyd (1975) reported that macrophytes compete with phytoplankton <br />through shading and uptake of phosphorus, thus reducing food base for pelagic zooplankton. In <br />addition to a nutrient availability or shading effect from macrophytes, zooplankton numbers may <br />also have been reduced by grazing from the abundant age-O fishes in the wetland. Most likely, <br />both factors contributed to the decline of open water zooplankton in Old Charley Wash. Despite <br />the significant reduction in zooplankton densities in June and July, no noticeable reduction in <br />growth of age-O carp was detectable in length frequencies. It is likely that alternate prey sources <br />associated with macrophytic growth were available to maintain growth. <br />The timing and duration of the nursery environment provided by floodplain wetlands like <br />Old Charley Wash could be critical to the growth and survival of razorback sucker larvae in the <br />spring. During May and early June, main channel habitats were colder, zooplankton densities <br />were low, and few velocity refuges existed. Larval razorback sucker first appear in the main <br />channel at approximately peak flows (Tyus 1987, Muth et al. 1997) and were collected for at <br />least six weeks afterward in the main channel (Muth et al. 1997). Most floodplain habitat in the <br />Ouray area is lost below 447 m3/s (minimum flows that inundate floodplain in the Ouray area, <br />Flo Engineering 1996, although flows overtop Old Charley Wash dikes through a ditch at <br />approximately 396 m3/s). In the absence of off-channel wetlands, most larval fish in floodplains <br />would be forced into the main channel after flows receded below approximately 447 m3/s. In <br />1995, floodplains were disconnected from the main channel of the river (447m3/s) 36 d before the <br />appearance of most backwaters (i.e. 109 m3/s, i.e. Pucherelli et al. 1988). In 1996, the first <br />razorback sucker larvae were collected in the river after flows receded below 447 m3/s. The <br />number of days between the first and last razorback sucker larvae collected in 1996 (June 3 to 27; <br />Bruce Haines, personal communication) and the time flows reached 109 m3/s was 37 d and 13 d, <br />respectively. Once backwaters appeared, these habitats would provide favorable temperatures, <br />but lack vegetative cover found in floodplains and wetlands and have marginal prey densities. <br />Papoulias and Minckley (1990) reported that larval razorback sucker die if they do not feed <br /> <br />41 <br />