Laserfiche WebLink
<br />94 nun (range = 74-125 nun) in total length and 9.5 g (range = 3-18 g). In 1996,45 age-O <br />razorback sucker were collected earlier (August) and averaged 65.9 nun (range = 44-83 nun) in <br />total length and 3.8 g (1-6 g). In 1995 two razorback sucker adults were collected, while none <br />were collected in 1996. Inunature Colorado squawfish (total length ranges 175-207 nun, and <br />115-155 nun in 1995 and 1996, respectively), flannelmouth sucker and roundtail chub were also <br />collected in both 1995 and 1996. Speckled dace were identified only in 1996, but may have been <br />present in 1995. The percentage offish collected over time was not uniform during the draining <br />period in 1996. Adult fishes, with the exception of green sunfish, were collected at the outlet <br />structure throughout the draining process (Figure 16). Most channel catfish were actually caught <br />midway through the draining process in 1996. In addition, red shiner were also collected <br />throughout the draining process, although most were taken during the last few days of draining. <br />Age-O yearclass of the most abundant nonnative fishes and fathead minnows showed little <br />tendency to move into the drainage outlet until the last few days of draining. Native species <br />showed different tendencies, flannelmouth sucker and Colorado squawfish moved to the drainage <br />outlet earlier in the draining process as well as later, whereas, most razorback sucker did not <br />move into the drainage outlet until the last days of draining. <br /> <br />Discussion <br />Suitability of Old Charley Wash as a nursery site <br />Old Charley Wash provided a favorable environment for fish, particularly age-O fishes <br />during years when spring flows inundated the wetland. Water quantity and quality existed <br />throughout the spring and summer to support age-O and adult fishes. Water loss through <br />evaporation and seepage would have created an adverse environment for fishes had not water <br />from the Green River been supplemented during the low flow year of 1994. Water temperatures <br />in the main channel were similar to Old Charley Wash after mid-June during the low flow year of <br />the study, but during the two high flow years, water temperatures in Old Charley Wash were <br />consistently higher than main channel temperatures. Later in the spring or summer, when most <br />backwaters begin appearing in the Jensen and Ouray areas of the river (i.e. 109m3/s [Pucherelli et <br />al. 1988]), warmer habitats would become available to fish in the main channel. However, until <br />river flows receded sufficiently to allow the appearance of backwaters, Old Charley Wash and <br />other floodplain habitats provided the best thermal environment for growth of larval and juvenile <br />fish in the Green River. <br />Zooplankton densities in surface waters from Old Charley Wash were much higher than <br />in backwaters in the Middle Green River in 1994. Peak zooplankton densities in Old Charley <br />Wash were 43 organismsll an 54 organismsll in 1995 and 1996, respectively. Greater <br />zooplankton densities in Old Charley Wash coincided with larval razorback sucker appearance in <br />the Green River during the three years of this study (i.e. peak and post peak flows, Muth et al. <br />1997). Grabowski and Hiebert (1989) reported that zooplankton Green River backwaters varied <br />from 0.44 zooplanktonll in Island Park to 1.5 zooplanktonll in Ouray. Mabey (1993) reported <br />zooplankton densities of 7.1/1 and 1.5/1 (using a 63 mu mesh, compared to 243 mu mesh used in <br />this study) in a riverine backwater near Ouray in July and August, respectively, compared to <br />311.4/1 and 690.2/1 during the same time in Old Charley Wash. In main channel habitats Mabey <br />(1993) reported only 1.3 and 0.3 zooplanktersll in July and August, respectively. Based on <br />invertebrate densities, Cooper and Severn (1994) concluded that offchannel wetlands were more <br /> <br />39 <br />