My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8007
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:27:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8007
Author
Modde, T.
Title
Fish Use Of Old Charley Wash
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
an assessment of floodplain wetland importance to razorback sucker management and recovery.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />94 nun (range = 74-125 nun) in total length and 9.5 g (range = 3-18 g). In 1996,45 age-O <br />razorback sucker were collected earlier (August) and averaged 65.9 nun (range = 44-83 nun) in <br />total length and 3.8 g (1-6 g). In 1995 two razorback sucker adults were collected, while none <br />were collected in 1996. Inunature Colorado squawfish (total length ranges 175-207 nun, and <br />115-155 nun in 1995 and 1996, respectively), flannelmouth sucker and roundtail chub were also <br />collected in both 1995 and 1996. Speckled dace were identified only in 1996, but may have been <br />present in 1995. The percentage offish collected over time was not uniform during the draining <br />period in 1996. Adult fishes, with the exception of green sunfish, were collected at the outlet <br />structure throughout the draining process (Figure 16). Most channel catfish were actually caught <br />midway through the draining process in 1996. In addition, red shiner were also collected <br />throughout the draining process, although most were taken during the last few days of draining. <br />Age-O yearclass of the most abundant nonnative fishes and fathead minnows showed little <br />tendency to move into the drainage outlet until the last few days of draining. Native species <br />showed different tendencies, flannelmouth sucker and Colorado squawfish moved to the drainage <br />outlet earlier in the draining process as well as later, whereas, most razorback sucker did not <br />move into the drainage outlet until the last days of draining. <br /> <br />Discussion <br />Suitability of Old Charley Wash as a nursery site <br />Old Charley Wash provided a favorable environment for fish, particularly age-O fishes <br />during years when spring flows inundated the wetland. Water quantity and quality existed <br />throughout the spring and summer to support age-O and adult fishes. Water loss through <br />evaporation and seepage would have created an adverse environment for fishes had not water <br />from the Green River been supplemented during the low flow year of 1994. Water temperatures <br />in the main channel were similar to Old Charley Wash after mid-June during the low flow year of <br />the study, but during the two high flow years, water temperatures in Old Charley Wash were <br />consistently higher than main channel temperatures. Later in the spring or summer, when most <br />backwaters begin appearing in the Jensen and Ouray areas of the river (i.e. 109m3/s [Pucherelli et <br />al. 1988]), warmer habitats would become available to fish in the main channel. However, until <br />river flows receded sufficiently to allow the appearance of backwaters, Old Charley Wash and <br />other floodplain habitats provided the best thermal environment for growth of larval and juvenile <br />fish in the Green River. <br />Zooplankton densities in surface waters from Old Charley Wash were much higher than <br />in backwaters in the Middle Green River in 1994. Peak zooplankton densities in Old Charley <br />Wash were 43 organismsll an 54 organismsll in 1995 and 1996, respectively. Greater <br />zooplankton densities in Old Charley Wash coincided with larval razorback sucker appearance in <br />the Green River during the three years of this study (i.e. peak and post peak flows, Muth et al. <br />1997). Grabowski and Hiebert (1989) reported that zooplankton Green River backwaters varied <br />from 0.44 zooplanktonll in Island Park to 1.5 zooplanktonll in Ouray. Mabey (1993) reported <br />zooplankton densities of 7.1/1 and 1.5/1 (using a 63 mu mesh, compared to 243 mu mesh used in <br />this study) in a riverine backwater near Ouray in July and August, respectively, compared to <br />311.4/1 and 690.2/1 during the same time in Old Charley Wash. In main channel habitats Mabey <br />(1993) reported only 1.3 and 0.3 zooplanktersll in July and August, respectively. Based on <br />invertebrate densities, Cooper and Severn (1994) concluded that offchannel wetlands were more <br /> <br />39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.