My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9483
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9483
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:27:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9483
Author
Mitchell, M. J.
Title
Impact of the Procedures for Stocking Nonnative Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin on Private Landowners and the Commercial Aquaculture Industry.
USFW Year
no dat
USFW - Doc Type
Longmont.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Pond owners indicated that fish were present in 32% of all ponds representing 113.7 acres of the <br />271 acres where information was provided along the Colorado River. This would equate to 42% <br />of the surface water for which i\formation was provided. <br /> <br />Based on the number of ponds it\. <br />the study , warm water fish were <br />reported to be present in all ponds <br />for which information was provided. <br />Only 10% of the ponds along the <br />Gunnison River indicated fish were <br />present and respondents stated <br />coldwater fish were present. <br />Respondents did not provide much <br />information for fish present along <br />the Gunnison River. It is worthy of <br />note that no information was <br />provided for ponds in either <br />corridor managed by the Colorado <br />Division of Wildlife. Since this <br />agency is responsible for fish <br />management on all state and federal <br />laild management agency land and <br />public ownership is 56% of the ponds along the Gunnison and 27% along the Colorado, it is likely <br />that the percentage of ponds with fish in them is much higher than our survey indicates. <br /> <br />Fig II: Fish Species <br /> <br />Distribution in ponds <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />c <br />~ 10 <br />.... <br />CD <br />Co <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />~ rn~~I. <br />I I I I <br />Ib bc cp gc fm bg sk te It bt rt cf cc <br />Species of Fish <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />[ffiJ Both Rivers <br />II <br /> <br />II <br />. <br /> <br />The species of fish present in most ponds reporting were either all warmwater fish or were <br />stocked and maintained in concert with catchable coldwater fish. Figure II illustrates the <br />percentage of ponds that indicated each species or generic group offish were present. <br />Largemouth bass and bluegill were the most widely distributed fish. These species were reported <br />as being present in 18.6% and 16.5% of the ponds respectively. Black crappie were reported to be <br />present in 12% of ponds identified. Grouping channel catfish were reported to be in 6% of the <br />ponds while catfish (bullheads included) were reported to be in 13% of the ponds. All other <br />species or groups for which information was provided ranged from 1 %-1 0%. Fish were stocked <br />in 4% of the ponds reporting within the last 5 years. This stocking activity took place on 20% of <br />the surface area of the ponds reporting in the study. <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.