My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8155
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8155
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:27:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8155
Author
Minckley, W. L.
Title
Executive Summary
USFW Year
1985.
USFW - Doc Type
Native Fishes and Natural Aquatic Habitats in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region II West of the Continental Divide.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />\ <br /> <br />spavJning of bon;dail in ~a.rthen pe,nds 3.t Dext~r, and their sur'Ji'.Ja.l and <br />growth wi th a mixed population of ~osquitofish and African cichl ids in <br />pc,nds at Bl:lthe, Californi.3. (SHti'Jn iI, p. 48) indic3.te that ~pec:es j.s <br />pe~haps mere hardy than expected. And, success at pond c~l ture of <br />razorback sucker indicahs a high sur'.)i'Hbilit/ of that sp~cies undH <br />cond: tions qui te different than those in the prime'H1 ri\!Hine habi tat. <br /> <br />Most segments of the lowermost mainstream must be assigned to C~te9Qry <br />III since al1 but a fel,<J reaches l,<Jould entail substantial ef-fort and e;{pen.3e <br />to maintain for big-river fishes, other than by stocking. There are, <br />hO~'Jever, three viable possibilities for re-establishment of native fishes <br />in the system (Hinckley 1986): 1) stocking of selected backwaters and <br />river reaches, including those of del iver;..' canals and perhaps drains, i..<Ji th <br />big-river fiShes, either as fry in segments from which non-native fishes <br />have been removed or suppressed, or reared to sizes where reasonable <br />chances of survival accrue; 2) creation of suitable habitat on the <br />extensive USR~S ~MR holdings or elsewhere along the Colorado River to be <br />managed for perpetuation of the indigenous fauna; or 3) a combination of <br />and 2 above, involving use of suitabl~ habitats on Refuge lands to rear <br />indigenous fish~s to sub-adult or adult size prior to r~lease in th~ open <br />r-iver. <br /> <br />Opportunistic stocking of naturally or artificially isolated <br />bacKwat~rs along margins of major r~servoirs, or even canals and drains <br />after repairs or winter drawdowns, may also be used to increase native fish <br />populations. Such plac~s should be used as "grow-out" habitats, especially <br />if drawn down annually, with nativ~ fishes removed and introduced elsewhere <br />in the winter of each annual c:..'cle. If fry or fingerlings cDuld be placed <br />in such semi-natural or artificial habitats prior to reinvasion by <br />non-native fishes, populations might be expected to establ ish and be <br />maintained for considerable lengths of time. Successful natural <br />reproduction and larval growth to more than 25 mm TL of razorbacK sucKer <br />occurr-~d in such a backwater of Lake Mohave cleared of non-native fishes in <br />1985; larvae produced in the adjacent reservoir disappeared at about 12 rnm <br />TL (Langhorst, ASU, pers. comm.). Broad, sand-bottomed areas in the reach <br />of Colorado River mainstream below Park~r, Arizona, are relatively dH'oid <br />of lar-ger predators (MincKley 1979a) and selected backwaters or shallow <br />areas behind sandbars could be readily treated for removal of undesired <br />species without widespread or long-term impacts on sport fisheries. It <br />seems advisable to anticipate problems of species interactions adverse to <br />the native forms and rear native fishes to be stocKed in the mainstr~am to <br />fingerling or larger sizes prior to reintroduction, and local er:idication <br />or suppr-ession of non-native fish ~.tock~~ti 11 1 ikely be necessar;t. It is <br />unl ikely that reestabl ishment of of native fish populations ~lIould ha'.)e <br />discernible effects on the sports fishery in this or other parts of the <br />IOlAler basi n. <br /> <br />Creation of hati tat or reclamation of existing habitat :n NWR hold.ings <br />and other federal lands along the Colorado River seems the most highly <br />'.}iable .an,: ~:<pe,:itic-!J.= '.'JaY to ree~t.;b1i-=h bi:;-r;'ler .:::":",;"::i12,,t's:,f the <br />i n d j 9 e n c: ~~. 7.~ una < 'v' a 1 C 2: do n d lr,J j C k : 9 S 1; r'~; n c ~< i e /" 1 986), e -=. pee : d. 1 1 / sin C 2 <br />some of those spec!es are now knc~r to be capable of reproducing in lentic <br />habitats (Sec::on II, p. 48). Numerous c~t-~f+ ~~titats exist along The <br />lower Coloradc- River mainstream that could be rec:aimed by ichthyctcxin <br /> <br />~ ".~"., <br />1 :J '- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.