My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8221
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8221
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:20:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8221
Author
Van Steeter, M. M.
Title
Historic and Current Processes Affecting Channel Change and Endangered fish Habitats of the Colorado River Near Grand Junction, Colorado.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Doctor of Philosophy.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />':~>\ <br />o.{ <br />; <br /> <br />11 <br />what flows might form multi-thread channels through re-arranging bars <br />and eroding banks. Parker (1978) suggested that for gravel bed rivers with <br />non-cohesive banks, a shear stress 1.2 times the critical shear stress (tc) of <br />the bed material was needed to erode river banks. At ~his stress, the bed <br />material at the toe of the banks would become mobile, and bank erosion <br />would occur. The banks of the upper Colorado River are slightly cohesive <br />due to riparian vegetation, therefore complicating the situation. Andrews <br />(1984) determined that on gravel bed rivers in Colorado with thick <br />vegetation, stresses in excess of 2 times the critical shear stress were <br />necessary for bank erosion. Therefore, a discharge which yields a critical <br />shear stress equal to two times that for entrainment of the bed material <br />may be appropriate for the creation of habitat. Flows of this magnitude <br />can also disrupt the riparian plant community and select against <br />nonnative fishes which cannot survive high flow events. <br />In order to recover the Colorado squawfish, several questions must <br />still be answered. First, how have the habitats of these fishes changed? <br />Have channels become less braided, therefore causing a decrease in <br />habitat? Secondly, has there been a substantial change in the flow <br />characteristics of the upper Colorado River, and are these changes large <br />enough to affect the fishes and their habitats? Thirdly, if braided channels <br />benefit the Colorado squawfish, what flows are required to maintain and <br />create areas with multiple channels? <br /> <br />1 <br />j <br />::1 <br /> <br />:."'>'.j <br />.,- <br />'.:~' <br />"- <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />J <br />J <br />.J <br />_1 <br />J <br />:J <br />] <br />J <br />1 <br />,0J <br />} <br />1 <br /> <br />OBJECTIVES <br />There are five major objectives of this project: 1) to t]uantifiJ <br />historic changes in channel morphology and relate these changes to fish <br />habitat; 2) to investigate these changes in relation to water development, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.