Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />complex channel areas significantly (p>O.OOl) more often than would be <br />predicted if selection was random. <br /> <br />- .-: <br />j <br />- J <br /> <br />FACTORS LEADING TO THEIR DECLINE <br />Physical and Thermal Barriers <br />It is not clearly understood why many native fishes are nearing <br />extinction, but several factors are thought to be important. One obvious <br />factor is their reduced range. Dams and diversions span the Colorado <br />River and its tributaries from its headwaters to the Gulf of California. <br />This has fragmented their habitat and the loss of riverine reaches is <br />thought to be a major factor in the extirpation of native fishes from the <br />lower Colorado River basin (Stanford and Ward, 1986). There are fewer <br />main-stem dams in the upper basin, but they have caused similar <br />fragmentation and inhospitable conditions. For example, water <br />temperatures below Flaming Gorge Dam on the Green River are too cold <br />for Colorado squawfish spawning for approximately 108 kilometers (68 mi) <br />downstream until its waters are diluted by the Yampa River. Berry (1988) <br />suggests that these cold temperatures could be detrimental to endangered <br />fish larvae which are flushed out of the Yampa River system into the <br />Green, and subsequently experience "cold shock." There is also evidence <br />that temperatures in the upper reaches have always been sub-optimal for <br />reproduction relative to the lower basin (Kaeding and Osmundson, 1988). <br />Therefore, blocked access to the warmer waters of the lower basin, and the <br />cooling effect of dams in the upper basin, are potentially detrimental to the <br />reproduction and survival of native fishes. <br /> <br />'---~ <br />'I <br />J <br />J <br />J <br />J <br />J <br />I <br />] <br />'] <br />i <br />