My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9395
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9395
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:18:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9395
Author
Vaske, J. J., M. P. Donnelly and M. Lyon.
Title
Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes Toward the Endangered Fish of the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
20,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />14 <br /> <br />Basic Beliefs about Endangered Fish <br /> <br />Endangered Fish Survey <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />How people think about endangered fish might be related to their basic beliefs regarding these <br />species, The survey included three categories of basic beliefs (Table 4). Regarding the use of <br />endangered fish, 60% of all respondents felt the fish should be managed to benefit humans. <br />Over half (51 %) disagreed with the statement "Given the economic problems facing our <br />country, it makes little sense to spend money on programs to help save endangered fish," Two <br />thirds (66%) disagreed that endangered fish should not be recovered unless there is a direct <br />benefit to humans, <br /> <br />Nearly all (94%) believed that endangered fish have a right to live in the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin if they are capable of surviving, and three-quarters (75%) considered the rights of <br />endangered fish to be important. Equally as many (76%) felt it is important to have self- <br />sustaining populations of endangered fish, About two-thirds (65%) believed that future <br />generations should have an abundance of currently endangered fish, <br /> <br />Table 4. Basic beliefs re~ardin~ endan~ered fish <br />Basic Belief Statement Agree <br /> <br />Neutral <br /> <br />Disagree <br /> <br />Use of Endangered Fish <br /> <br />Humans should manage endangered fish <br />populations so that humans benefit <br /> <br />Given.the economic problems facing our country, <br />it makes little sense to spend money on programs <br />to help save endangered fish <br /> <br />Endangered fish should not be recovered unless <br />there is a direct benefit to humans <br /> <br />Regarding Endangered Fish Rights <br /> <br />If endangered fish are capable of surviving, then <br />they have a right to live in the Colorado River <br />Basin <br /> <br />The rights of endangered fish are important <br /> <br />The right of endangered fish to live is more <br />important than any negative effects they may have <br />on humans <br /> <br />Endangered Fish Bequest/Existence <br /> <br />It is important that there are self-sustaining <br />populations of the endangered fish <br /> <br />We should be sure that future generations have an <br />abundance of currently the endangered fish <br /> <br />The existence of endangered fish is not important <br />tome <br /> <br />60 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />39 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />51 <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />66 <br /> <br />94 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />75 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />56 <br /> <br />76 <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />65 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />65 <br /> <br />Cell entries are percentages <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.