Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-' , <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />A recent evaluation of the Upper Colorado River Fisheries Recovery Program (Stanford <br /> <br /> <br />1994) concluded that a standardized sampling program for monitoring aquatic invertebrates <br /> <br /> <br />should be implemented. Primary issues outlined by Stanford were the lack of information on th~ <br /> <br /> <br />distribution and abundance patterns of zoobenthos communities. the need to identify invertebrate <br /> <br /> <br />taxa and habitat types with a strong dependence on flow characteristics. and the need to develop <br /> <br /> <br />rapid assays to detect ifinvertebrate production might be limiting endangered fish populations. <br /> <br /> <br />An understanding of where and why changes in invertebrate communities occur will improve <br /> <br /> <br />our ability to predict how downstream invertebrate communities may change in relation to the <br /> <br /> <br />hydrologic regime. We also need to evaluate inter-habitat variation in invertebrate populations. <br /> <br /> <br />Certain habitats. e.g., backwaters. are thought to support higher production of invertebrates <br /> <br />(zoobenthos and zooplankton) than others, e.g.; main channel runs (Stanford 1994). Different <br /> <br />habitat types are also thought to exhibit variable sensitivity to discharge (Stanford 1994). <br /> <br /> <br />The design and implementation of a monitoring program should be an iterative process. <br /> <br />Sampling locations and methods should be added, removed. or modified as results are evaluated <br /> <br /> <br />annually. The sampling program outlined here should be viewed more as a starting point rather <br /> <br />than as long-term protocols. The initial emphasis of the project should be to delineate sampling <br /> <br /> <br />locations and describe both the inter- and intrahabitat variability of invertebrate communities <br /> <br /> <br />within and among sampling reaches. This initial data from this project will. allow us to design a <br />custom fit sampling program for individual reaches and habitats and will result in a better final <br />monitoring project. ffitimately the key to making this monitoring project useful and cost-effecting <br /> <br />2 <br />