My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9616
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9616
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:17:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9616
Author
Vinson, M.
Title
A Sampling Strategy for Assessing Aquatic Invertebrate Communities Associated with Endangered Fish Populations in the Upper Colorado River Basin - June 1996.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Introduction <br /> <br />A recent evaluation of the Upper Colorado River Fishes Recovery Program (Stanford <br />1994) concluded that a standardized sampling program for monitoring aquatic invertebrates <br />should be implemented. Primary issues outlined by Stanford were the lack of information on <br />the distribution and abundance patterns of zoobenthos communities, the need to identify <br />invertebrate taxa and habitat types with a strong dependence on flow characteristics, and the <br />need to develop rapid assays to detect if invertebrate production might be limiting endangered <br />fish populations. <br /> <br />An understanding of where and why changes in invertebrate communities occur will <br />improve our ability to predict how downstream invertebrate communities may change in f <br />relation to the hydrologic regime. We also need to evaluate inter-habitat variation in <br />invertebrate populations. Certain habitats, e.g., backwaters, are thought to support higher <br />production of invertebrates (zoobenthos and zooplankton) than others, e.g., main channel <br />runs (Stanford 1994). Different habitat types are also thought to exhibit variable sensitivity <br />to discharge (Stanford 1994). <br /> <br />The design and implementation of a monitoring program should be an iterative process. <br />Sampling locations and methods should be added, removed, or modified as results are <br />evaluated annually. The sampling program outlined here should be viewed more as a starting <br />point rather than as long-term protocols. The initial emphasis of the project should be to <br />delineate sampling locations and describe both the inter- and intrahabitat variability of <br />invertebrate communities within and among sampling reaches. This initial data from this <br />project will allow us to design a custom fit sampling program for individual reaches and <br />habitats and will result in a better final monitoring project. Ultimately the key to m~ng this <br />monitoring project useful and cost-effective will be in defining a reasonable set of key habitat <br />types and reaches to sample. In this proposal, I have described field, laboratory, and office <br />procedures that will allow us to delineate invertebrate assemblages and better understand <br />their response to changing hydrologic regimes. <br /> <br />Objectives <br /> <br />The listed objectives are designed to describe current macroinvertebrate assemblages and <br />assess the effects of future conditions on these assemblages. <br /> <br />Objective 1. Determine longitudinal patterns in benthic macroinvertebrate communities. <br /> <br />Objective 2. Identify habitat specific aquatic macroinvertebrate taxa that can be used as <br />indicators of quality habitat. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.