My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7729
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7729
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:16:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7729
Author
Valdez, R. A., W. J. Masslich and A. Wasowicz.
Title
Annual Summary Report - 1990\
USFW Year
1991.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1980-81). These differences are unexplained but may represent variable spawning success between <br />the two years. <br /> <br />4.3 Summary of Colorado Squawfish Habitat Assessment <br /> <br />Habitat suitability assessment of the Dolores River for Colorado squawfish was divided into three <br />components: 1) physical attributes; 2) chemical attributes and 3) biological attributes. Each of these <br />components is address in detail in the following sections. <br /> <br />43.1 Physical Attributes <br /> <br />Habitat suitability of the Dolores River is influenced by the physical attributes of the system such as <br />flow, temperature, substrate characteristics, habitat structure, and channel morphology. Measuring <br />these physical attributes individually is generally not difficult. However determining the combination <br />of these physical attributes most suitable to a species like the Colorado squawfish is not well defined, <br />particularly since the fish cannot be observed directly. Consequently, for the purposes of this study, <br />it was necessary to use information collected on physical habitat for Colorado squawfish from other <br />river systems and assume that if physical attributes of the Dolores River fall within the same range, <br />physical habitat in the Dolores River is probably suitable and does not represent a limiting factor in <br />the system. <br /> <br />Criteria for physical habitat suitability of the Dolores River is based on habitat suitability index curves <br />developed by Valdez et al. (1987), for endangered fish in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Results <br />of studies of the Colorado squawfish in other Upper Basin drainages are also used to evaluate the <br />suitability of the Dolores River. Information collected from the Yampa and White rivers was of <br />particular interest, since these systems may be functionally comparable to the Dolores River in terms <br />of their role in the life history of the Colorado squawfish. <br /> <br />Flows <br /> <br />The Dolores River drainage exhibits a hydrograph that is generally typical of most Upper Colorado <br />River Basin drainages. Beginning in mid to late March, flows usually increase dramatically due to <br />rapidly warming temperatures that cause a sudden melt of mid-elevation snow pack. This early runoff <br />can peak quickly and begin to subside in mid to late April, when flows may increase again due to melt <br />of higher elevation snowpack. Following spring runoff, flows gradually subside until mid to late July. <br />From late July through September, the climate in the Dolores River region is often dominated by <br />moisture-laden Pacific air masses transported by a southwesterly flow of air. The result of this <br />"summer monsoon season" is frequent high intensity storms that result in brief flow spikes which can <br />be relatively large in magnitude. <br /> <br />For purposes of assessing the flows of the Dolores River system, the study area was divided into two <br />reaches, each with a distinct hydro graph. These reaches include: 1) the Dolores River above the <br />confluence of the San Miguel River (above RM 64.4) and; 2) the Dolores River below the confluence <br />of the San Miguel River (below RM 64.4). <br /> <br />Flows in the Dolores River above the confluence of the San Miguel River are dominated by releases <br />from McPhee Dam. Although, seasonal inputs from tributary drainages can contribute significant <br />flows during certain times, the operation of McPhee Dam has the greatest influence on the <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.