Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />BIO/WEST, Inc. conducted an investigation in 1990 and 1991 to determine the suitability of the <br />Dolores River for endangered Colorado River fIshes. Physical, chemical, and biological attributes <br />were assessed in six reaches of the lower 177 miles from BradfIeld Bridge to the confluence with the <br />Colorado River, The investigation was funded by Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) and <br />Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) through the Recovery Implementation Program for <br />Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin, The study was conducted in <br />cooperation with UDWR, Colorado Division of Wildlife, and U.S. FISh and Wildlife Service. <br /> <br />Nineteen species of fish were captured, including six native species and thirteen non-natives. <br />Native species included Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius), roundtail chub (Gila robusta), <br />flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus latipinnis), bluehead sucker (C, discobolus), speckled dace <br />(Rhinichthys osculus), and mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi). The most common non-native species <br />were red shiner (Cvorinella lutrensis), sand shiner (Notropis stramineus), fathead minnow <br />(Pimephales promelas), carp (Cyprinus carpio), and channel catfISh (Ictalurus punctatus). Native <br />species composed 19 percent of total fish numbers, which was four times higher than the adjacent <br />Colorado River, and indicative of a relatively good native fish fauna. No significant changes in <br />species composition were evident when compared to a similar survey in 1981, indicating that the <br />ichthyofaunal community remained relatively stable over the last ten years. <br /> <br />Four Colorado squawfish were captured within 2 km of the confluence with the Colorado River <br />in August and October, 1991. The species was reported in the Dolores River in the 1950's and <br />1960's, but spills of uranium mill wastes in the lower San Miguel River in mid-l960 killed most of the <br />fish in the lower 60 miles of the Dolores River, Colorado squawfish were not captured in surveys <br />in 1971 and 1981, and seven squawfish reported from the lower 6 miles of the San Miguel River in <br />1973 were unconfirmed. <br /> <br />Cross-sectional analyses, habitat mapping, and comparisons with the Yampa and White rivers <br />revealed that the Dolores River channel was suitable for all life stages of Colorado squawfish, but <br />low flows during this investigation reduced fISh habitat value, Deep pools and adjacent gravel/cobble <br />riffles were judged suitable for holding adults and juveniles, and for staging and spawning. Backwater <br />formation was limited and ephemeral, reducing the value of the Dolores River as a nursery for young <br />Colorado squawfish, However, the Dolores River confluence was tocated immediately upstream of <br />a major nursery on the Colorado River. <br /> <br />Water quality appeared suitable for Colorado squawfish most of the year. Removal of uranium <br />mill wastes reduced levels of radionucleides and heavy metals, However, during summer flood events <br />associated with high intensity rain storms, copper and iron were released into the system at potentially <br />lethal levels from either instream sediments or tributary input of erodible soils. High water hardness <br />may ameliorate toxic effects of these elements but further study is required to assess potential impacts <br />of heavy metals. <br /> <br />McPhee Dam, constructed in 1984 about 200 miles upstream of the confluence with the Colorado <br />River, has reduced high spring flows and augmented base summer, fall, and winter flows. Base flow <br />releases of 20 to 40 cfs in 1990 and 1991 reduced native fish habitat in the lower 170 miles of the <br />Dolores River through decreased fish holding areas, dewatered nursery backwaters, impeded <br />movement, and enhanced sedimentation. We recommend minimum base flow releases of 50 cfs <br />during dry and normal years, and 78 cfs during wet years, <br /> <br />II <br />