Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />successful spawning and rearing for these species. High numbers of YOY red shiners, sand shiners <br />and fathead minnows were also captured, particularly during 1990. High numbers of these species <br />in 1990 may be a result of favorable spawning and rearing conditions created by consistent low flows <br />that year. <br /> <br />Native species were prominent in the middle reaches of the study area (Figure 3). Non-native <br />species may be more common in the lower reaches because of the Colorado River and in the upper <br />reaches because of McPhee Dam. Influxes of non-native species from the Colorado River probably <br />shifted species composition in the lower reaches. In the upper reaches, habitat changes associated <br />with the operation of McPhee Dam may have altered species composition. Stocking and management <br />of non-native salmonid ftshes below McPhee have also affected species composition in the upper <br />reaches. <br /> <br />Each of the four major native species exhibited a unique distribution through the study area as <br />a percentage of total species composition. Flannelmouth suckers were the most ubiquitous native <br />species in the drainage, although these were most prevalent in the middle reaches (Figure 4) <br />Bluehead suckers comprised a higher percentage in the lower reaches, but was common throughout <br />the study area (Figure 5), Roundtail chubs were most prevalent in the upper reaches (Figure 6), and <br />percentage of speckled dace was also higher in the upper reaches (Figure 7). <br /> <br />Analyses of seine samples also indicate that natives were more prevalent in the middle and upper <br />of the study area (Figure 8). The relatively high percent composition in Reach 3 during 1991, was <br />difficult to explain. A series of flood events that occurred in 1991 may have reduced the abundance <br />of non-native species in this reach. It is possible that increased composition of native species may <br />be representative of strong year classes of one or more of the native species, however this was not <br />reflected in catch rates for 1991. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />During Trip 4, 1991, a Floy-tagged flannelmouth sucker was recaptured at RM 52.8. The ftsh was <br />originally handled by the Service on May 14, 1981 at RM 39,5 (Valdez et al. 1982), measuring 474 <br />mm total length (TL) and weighing 1120 gms. The fISh was recaptured on April 6, 1991, 13 miles <br />upstream measuring 512 mm TL and weighing 993 gms, During a period of approximately 9 years <br />and 11 months the tish grew 38 mm and lost 127 gms. This translates to a growth rate of 3.8 <br />mm/year. The weight loss can be attributed to numerous factors (i.e. condition, observer error, etc.). <br /> <br />4.2 Summary of Fish Collections by Gear Type with CPE Statistics <br /> <br />Results of fish sampling efforts for each gear type are presented in the following sections (Table <br />2). <br /> <br />4.2.1 Electrofishing <br /> <br />Flannelmouth sucker, roundtail chub, bluehead sucker, carp and channel cattish were the most <br />abundant species in the catch using canoe electrotishing during both years of the study (Table 7). <br />Differences in catch-per-effort (CPE) between the 2 years were difficult to interpret but were <br />probably associated with <br />one or more factors including: 1) actual changes in density; 2) different conditions (Le, flow, water <br />quality) between trips and years; 3) differences in timing of sampling between the 2 years of study. <br /> <br />Highest catch rates for canoe electrotishing (Table 7) were for flannelmouth sucker (105.7 tish/to <br />hours), roundtail chub (52.8), bluehead sucker (30.0) and carp (29.0). Highest catch rates for Jon <br /> <br />7 <br />