My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7337
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7337
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:16:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7337
Author
Valdez, R. A., R. J. Ryel and R. Williams.
Title
Endangered Fishes of Cataract Canyon
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
The Importance of the Colorado River above Lake Powell to the Colorado Squawfish, Humpback Chub, and Bonytail.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />RESULTS <br /> <br />Summary Of Fish Collections <br /> <br />A total of 22 species of fishes, representing 11 families, were handled <br />during this investigation (Table 1). As a percentage of total catch for the <br />region of the lower Green, Cataract Canyon, and upper Lake Powell, the most <br />common species caught were red shiner (57.73%), channel catfish (20.52%), <br />and common carp (11.26%). These three introduced species made up 89.51% of <br />the total catch. <br /> <br />Of the 22 flsh species recorded, 15 are introduced and only 7 are <br />native. As a percentage of total catch, the ratio of introduced to native <br />species was 96.7 to 3.3. The endangered species (Colorado squawfish, 1.97%; <br />humpback chub, 0.04%; and bony tail, 0.01%) made up 2.02% of the total catch. <br />Razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) were not captured during this <br />investigation. <br /> <br />Fish species composition of Cataract Canyon differed considerably from <br />that of the surrounding region, primarily because of the influence of fishes <br />from Lake Powell. This influence increases the proportion of introduced, <br />species that were not encountered in Cataract Canyon, i.e. walleye, striped <br />bass, threadfin shad, black crappie, kokanee salmon, northern pike. <br /> <br />Within Cataract Canyon, there were 16 species handled, including 9 <br />introduced and 7 native (Table 1). In the Canyon, red shiners were most <br />abundant with 37.61% of the catch, followed by carp (19.94%) and channel <br />catfish (19.21%) for a total of 76.76%. Thus, these three introduced fishes <br />dominated the fish population of both Cataract Canyon and the region of the <br />upper basin. <br /> <br />Colorado Squawfish <br /> <br />A total of 517 Colorado squawfish were captured during the six trips, <br />including 4 adults, 3 juveniles, 509 YOY, and 1 emaciated fish that was not <br />classified by age group. These fish were captured from RM 41.8 on the Green <br />River downstream to RM 199.6 near Imperial Canyon in upper Lake Powell. <br />Three of the four adults and all three juveniles were captured within <br />Cataract Canyon between RM 206.5 and 213.9. One adult was caught in upper <br />Lake Powell at RM 201.2. <br /> <br />Distribution Of YOY. Of the 509 YOY squawfish handled, 67.78% came <br />from the Green River within 41.8 miles of its confluence with the Colorado <br />River, while 29.86% came from Cataract Canyon (RM 216.5-201.0), and only <br />2.36% came from upper Lake Powell (RM 201.0-196.5) (Fig. 2). Since sampling <br />in each of the three regions differed in intensity, catch per unit effort <br />(~PE) is presented for a more comparative analysis. CPE was 4.30 YOY per 10 <br />m in "the Green River, 0.82 in Cataract Canyon, and 0.09 in upper Lake <br />Powell. The Colorado Ri ver above the conf1 uence was not sampl ed since YOY <br />sampl ing was being conducted by the USFWS. CPE for the lower 40 miles of <br />the Green River (4.30) was higher than recorded by Archer a~d Tyus (1984) of <br />USFWS, who presented a mean CPE of about 1. 7 YOY per 10 m for the peri od <br />1979-1982. This investigation may have yielded a higher CPE because of <br />annual variation in fish density or because sampl ing was conducted earl ier <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.