Laserfiche WebLink
<br />24 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />hatching of eggs and holding of larvae in an off stream facility would be required so that offspring <br />could be transported to a hatchery for rearing to size suitable for PIT-tagging. Ultimately the fish <br />could be released into the Dolores River to test chemoreception and homing hypotheses. <br /> <br />4.4.2 Release of Juveniles <br /> <br />Experimental stocking of juvenile Colorado squawfish has been attempted numerous times in the <br />lower basin of the Colorado River with limited success. Unsuccessful attempts to recapture tagged <br />fish has limited the ability of researchers to evaluate survival and dispersal of stocked individuals. It <br />has been hypothesized that high levels of predation on stocked fish are the reason for limited <br />recaptures. The relatively low predator density in the Dolores River is conducive to stocking juvenile <br />Colorado squawfish for purposes of assessing survival and dispersaL PIT-tagging the juveniles before <br />releases would allow for accurate recapture information on growth and distnbution of individual <br />squawfish. Biologically, the Dolores River appears suitable to provide needs for early life stages of <br />this species. <br /> <br />4.4.3 Chemoreception studies with adults <br /> <br />Chemoreception studies recently proposed in the Upper Basin could be conducted in the Dolores <br />River. Hatchery-reared individuals imprinted to a scent marker (i.e. morpho line ) could be introduced <br />into the Dolores River to test chemoreception and homing hypotheses. Suitability of the Dolores <br />River for this type of research is increased by low numbers of squawfish that are currently present <br />in the drainage. <br /> <br />5.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS <br /> <br />1. Four Colorado squawfish were captured in the lower 2 km of the Dolores River in August <br />and October, 1991. <br /> <br />2. Physical habitat of the Dolores River was suitable for adult and juvenile Colorado squawfish, <br />although extremely low flows observed during the study may have restricted fish access from <br />the Colorado River and impaired movement within the Dolores River drainage. <br /> <br />3. Water quality of the Dolores River was suitable for Colorado squawfish and other native <br />species, although high levels of copper and iron were found during spring runoff and rain <br />spates. <br /> <br />4. Macroinvertebrate densities and high numbers of native and non-native forage fish species <br />indicate that the Dolores River is biologically suitable for Colorado squawfish. <br /> <br />5. Non-native fish represented 87% and 68% of the catch in 1990 and 1991 respectively, <br />indicating a potential for predation and competition with native species. Since the percentage <br />composition of non-natives in the Dolores River was relatively lower than other upper basin <br />rivers, predation and competition by non-natives was not considered a limiting factor for <br />native fish species. <br /> <br />6. No major changes in fish composition and numbers occurred as compared to the USFWS <br />survey in 1981. <br />