Laserfiche WebLink
<br />22 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Since analysis of fish muscle tissue was not performed on samples from the Dolores River, it is <br />not known if consumption of these fish represent a human health hazard. <br /> <br />4.3.4 lJiological Attributes <br /> <br />4.3.4.1 Macroinvertebrates. Eleven orders of macroinvertebrates were collected in the Dolores <br />River during the study (Tables 48-53). In 1990, 47.7% of all macroinvertebrates sampled were <br />Diptera, mostly from the family Simuliidae. Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera comprised 22.4% and <br />20.5% of all invertebrates, respectively. In 1991 invertebrate composition was more evenly distributed <br />among Ephemeroptera (28.7%), Diptera (28.4%), and Trichoptera (28.4%). Invertebrate <br />composition in the San Miguel River in 1990 was dominated by Diptera (926%), most of which were <br />Simuliidae collected from one sample on Trip 1. Invertebrates sampled in the San Miguel in 1991 <br />were primarily Diptera (46.8%), Ephemeroptera (25.5%), and Trichoptera (15%). <br /> <br />Longitudinal composition of macroinvertebrates in the Dolores River in 1990-1991 was fairly <br />consistent. In 1990, there was a gradual shift in composition downstream as Trichoptera increased <br />from 2.2% at RM 122.5 to 37.8% at RM 1.3. Conversely, Diptera declined downstream, from 70.4% <br />at RM 122.5 to 32.3% at RM 1.3. The same trend was not evident in 1991 samples. <br /> <br />A summary of invertebrate collections prior to this study is presented in Table 54. It was difficult <br />to make meaningful comparisons of historical macroinvertebrate data because of inherent differences <br />in techniques, season, flows, etc. Little information on macroinvertebrates in the Dolores and San <br />Miguel rivers was available before 1980, but what does exist indicates very low species diversity in <br />both systems in the 1970's and 80's. Some insight may be gained by examining the presence or <br />absence of "indicator species", that is specific macroinvertebrate taxa that are known to be pollution <br />tolerant or intolerant. In 1960, pollution intolerant Plecoptera were absent from samples collected <br />in the San Miguel River, but this taxa was present in samples collected in the 1980's and 90's. This <br />evidence supports water chemistry and sediment analysis which indicate a substantial improvement <br />in water quality of the San Miguel River since the 1960's. Pollution-intolerant Trichopterans (Le., <br />Glossosomatidae) were present in both the Dolores and San Miguel rivers in 1990, but were not <br />found historically in samples prior to our study. <br /> <br />Biotic Condition Index (BCI) values were calculated for the Dolores and San Miguel rivers in <br />1991. The BCI is based on mean community tolerance, and is a composite of tolerance of individual <br />taxa which varies in response to intensity of perturbations in the ecosystem. Parameters analyzed in <br />calculating BCI include stream gradient and substrate, total alkalinity, sulfate concentration, and <br />tolerance quotients (TQ) for each macroinvertebrate taxon (USFS 1985). Relative to their own <br />potential, the Dolores (BCI=108) and San Miguel (BCI=56) rivers were rated excellent and fair to <br />poor, respectively. <br /> <br />Crayfish (Orceonectes virilis) were abundant in the Dolores River. Crayfish densities increased%in upper portions of the study. Beck (1989) reported mean catch rates of 3.3 crayfish/trap <br /> day (24 <br />hours) from RM 76 to RM 101, 20.1 crayfish/trap day from RM 102 to RM 128 below the <br />confluence of Disappointment Creek and 41.5 crayfish/trap day from RM 129 at the confluence to <br />Disappointment Creek to RM 173 near Bradfield Bridge. Data from a similar survey done in 1991 <br />resulted in 5.5, 13.1 and 58.3 crayfish/trap day respectively for the same reaches discussed above (T. <br />Beck Pers. Comm. April 1992). <br />