Laserfiche WebLink
<br />20 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />il <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />related to low flows and saline groundwater inflow in Paradox Valley. On Trip 6, conductivity <br />increased across Paradox Valley, from 784 umbos/em at RM 74.0 to 1820 umbos/em at RM 68.5. <br /> <br />4.3.2.15 Dissolved Oxyeen. Dissolved oxygen in the Dolores River was measured during five of <br />six trips in 1990-1991, and generally ranged from 7 to 10 mg/L EPA's standards for non-salmonid <br />fisheries are 6.5 mg/l for early life stages and 6.0 mg/l for all other life stages. <br /> <br />4.3.3 Fish Tissue and Sediment Analysis <br /> <br />4.3.3.1 Sediment Analvsis. Radium (R-226) may be introduced into stream sediments when <br />uranium mill wastes are released into a stream, either by direct discharge or seepage (Tsivoglou et <br />al. 1960). Stream sediments act as radium reservoirs, collecting and storing this element. Where <br />concentrations of most elements decrease with increased stream flow, the release of dissolved radium <br />from sediments is stimulated by increased velocities and turbulence. <br /> <br />Radium in sediments from the Dolores and San Miguel rivers ranged from 6.2 to 8.0 pCi/g, except <br />for a concentration of 20.4 pCi/g at RM 59.7, just below tbe confluence of the San Miguel River <br />(Table 42). Historically, fluctuating but similar levels of radium were recorded in Dolores River <br />sediment for four study areas from 1960-63 (Table 44). Measurements by BIO/WEST in 1991 <br />showed similar concentrations in three areas, and somewhat higher concentrations in the three <br />remaining areas. Radium concentrations at RM 0.1 of the San Miguel increased greatly in 1960-63, <br />but levels in 1991 were substantially lower. In 1960, radium concentrations were measured in <br />sediments from the Dolores River, above Slickrock, and from the San Miguel River above Naturita. <br />These concentrations were used as "background levels" of radioactivity in river sediments located <br />upstream of sources of man-made contamination (PHS 1961). Based on these results, sediment from <br />three sites on the Dolores River contained from 3 to 3.3 times the amount of background radiation. <br />The remaining site on the Dolores River measured 9.3 times greater than background levels. <br />Sediments from the single study site in the San Miguel River were 5.6 times greater than background. <br />In 1956, Tsivoglou reported concentrations as high as 2,100 pCi/g in the San Miguel River below the <br />Naturita uranium mill, or 2,100 times background levels (Tsivoglou et al. in Sigler et a1. 1966). <br /> <br />Radium concentrations in sediments of the Dolores and SaD Miguel rivers appeared in a state of <br />improvement since peak uranium operations in the 1950's. The closure of the Uravan Mill in 1970, <br />and the subsequent Super Fund clean-up program initiated in 1988, were probably the main reasons <br />for this improvement. In the 1960's, radium in Dolores River sediments appeared to increase with <br />distance downstream (Table 41), possibly because of decreased radium inputs (i.e. closure of the mill <br />in 1970) and gradual movement of existing radium in downstream sediments. No longitudinal trends <br />were apparent for radium measured in 1991. <br /> <br />Although analysis of heavy metals was not included in the Dolores River sediment analysis, it is <br />likely that high concentrations of at least certain metals were present since stream sediments may <br />serve as storage reservoirs and primary sources of bioconcentration (Van Hassel et ale 1980). Mathis <br />et al. (1979) reported concentrations of cadmium in sediments of an experimental power plant pond <br />of about 450 times the amount found in the water; lead in sediments was concentrated about 4,000 <br />times that in water. <br /> <br />4.3.3.2 Fish Tissue Analvsis. Eighteen individual fish representing three species were collected <br />during Trip 6 for tissue analysis (Table 42). Although variance between samples can be high, <br />maximum metal concentrations within fISh species is a good indicator of potential bioaccumulation <br />problems in the system. Maximum levels of metals (mglkg) in liver and kidney tissue from three fish <br />