My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7046 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7046 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:16:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7046
Author
Valdez, R. A., W. J. Masslich and A. Wasowicz.
Title
Final Report\
USFW Year
1992.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1\ <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />earlier warming when compared to the Colorado River (Figure 12). The Colorado River generally <br />reached comparable temperatures 10 to 20 days after the Dolores River. Temperatures in the <br />Dolores were consistently higher than in the Colorado River except during November - January. The <br />effect of differences in warming of the Colorado and Dolores rivers on migration and spawning cues <br />of Colorado squawfIsh is unknown. <br /> <br />RM 64.5-177.0. Temperatures in this reach ranged from 0 to 30 oC, with highs occurring in July <br />and August and lows in winter months. Releases from McPhee Dam had a profound effect on <br />temperatures in this region. Effects were seen in both diel and annual temperature patterns. Diel <br />temperature patterns were primarily affected by low volume releases during summer months. During <br />this time, diel temperature swings were extreme because of the small thermal mass in stream flow. <br />This problem was particularly acute in low velocity habitats such as pools and backwaters where warm <br />temperatures were often accompanied by depressed oxygen levels. From April through July, 1991, <br />the monthly extreme diel temperature ranges in the mainstem Dolores River, just above the San <br />Miguel River confluence, were 3.2-8.9, 5.9-12.3, 13.6-19.4, and 13.9-20.10C, respectively (T. Beck, <br />CDOW, unpublished data). <br /> <br />Changes to annual temperature patterns related to the operation of McPhee Dam were <br />potentially deleterious to native species. Premature warming during low flows in April and May <br />initiated gonadal maturation and spawning by native fish species including roundtail chub, <br />flannelmouth sucker and bluehead sucker. Warm temperatures followed by cold releases probably <br />killed large numbers of eggs and larvae. Data provided by CDOW indicate that water temperatures <br />during low flows (20 cfs) in 1990 reached 160C by mid April and 180C by the first week in May. <br />Large aggregations of flannelmouth suckers were observed during the same time period in the upper <br />Dolores River and individuals showing signs of spawning readiness were captured (T. Beck CDOW, <br />pers. comm.). <br /> <br />A distinct temperature break occurred at the confluence of Disappointment Creek (RM 128.7). <br />Above this point, under normal flow conditions, the Dolores River was relatively cooL The river <br />flowed through extensive canyon areas which delayed warming. Below Disappointment Creek the <br />channel became more open and the river warmed as it traversed a broad flood plain. During the <br />summer, main channel temperatures above and below Disappointment Creek differed by as much as <br />40C and turbidity increased significantly below (Beck 1989). Higher turbidity below Disappointment <br />Creek was the result of highly erodible shales and sandstones. Disappointment Creek represented <br />a distinct geomorphic transition in the Dolores River system where the river changed from a cool, <br />clear stream to a warm, turbid system. <br /> <br />4.3.1.3 Habitat Availability/Channel MoroholO2V. A general description of channel morphology <br />and gross habitat structure of the Dolores River was presented by Valdez et a1. (1982). This <br />description included maximum and average depths, channel width and a description of floodplain and <br />channel characteristics. The present study indicated that few changes in gross physical habitat <br />occurred in the Dolores River since 1981, except for sedimentation. Observations and <br />communications (Personal communication with T. Beck, CDOW) indicate that fine sediments <br />accumulated in the Dolores River channeL This problem was most acute above the confluence of <br />the San Miguel River where McPhee Dam greatly reduced or eliminated spring runoff flushing flows. <br />Below the confluence of the San Miguel River, sediment was less evident. Additional studies would <br />be required to evaluate sedimentation and channel armoring. A description of habitat and channel <br />morphology for each reach of the study area is presented below. <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.